2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided design of short-lived phosphorescent Ru(II) polarity probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon excitation at the 1 MLCT absorption wavelength, a strong solvatochromism was observed for Ru2 from CH 2 Cl 2 (588 nm) to H 2 O (700 nm), suggesting a significantly strong solvent–complex interaction at the excited state. Such a large red shift has rarely been reported in Ru­(II) complexes and is much more evident than a red shift of only about 25 nm observed for the emission of Ru1 from CH 2 Cl 2 (600 nm) to H 2 O (625 nm) and even a maximum red shift of 40 nm from CH 2 Cl 2 (600 nm) to EtOAc (640 nm). The luminescence quantum yields of Ru1 and Ru2 were measured using [Ru­(bpy) 3 ] 2+ in water as a standard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Upon excitation at the 1 MLCT absorption wavelength, a strong solvatochromism was observed for Ru2 from CH 2 Cl 2 (588 nm) to H 2 O (700 nm), suggesting a significantly strong solvent–complex interaction at the excited state. Such a large red shift has rarely been reported in Ru­(II) complexes and is much more evident than a red shift of only about 25 nm observed for the emission of Ru1 from CH 2 Cl 2 (600 nm) to H 2 O (625 nm) and even a maximum red shift of 40 nm from CH 2 Cl 2 (600 nm) to EtOAc (640 nm). The luminescence quantum yields of Ru1 and Ru2 were measured using [Ru­(bpy) 3 ] 2+ in water as a standard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%