“…A pixel whose Dev Norm is smaller (i.e., more negative) than a preset threshold is considered to be a candidate of focal hypoattenuation and is used in the subsequent attempt to form focal hypoattenuation clusters. In comparison with the Z score method [14][15][16] which derived a standardized mean, μ, and standard deviation, σ, from a cohort of normal subjects, our approach has the benefit of being more adaptive to the variations of scanner parameters, such as KVP, milliampere exposure, window width and center settings, as well as variations between individual subjects. To enhance the reliability of focal hypoattenuation identification, we have also taken the slice immediately beneath the lower slice at the ganglionic level into consideration.…”