1992
DOI: 10.1016/0890-6955(92)90036-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized inspection of hypoid pinion face-milled tooth surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is based on error compensation and the other on direct extraction. Both 3 INSPECTION OFFSET SURFACE render better measuring accuracy than the reported algorithms (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). These approaches will be finally demDue to the local undulations and surface slope devionstrated by measuring hypoid gears.…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One is based on error compensation and the other on direct extraction. Both 3 INSPECTION OFFSET SURFACE render better measuring accuracy than the reported algorithms (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). These approaches will be finally demDue to the local undulations and surface slope devionstrated by measuring hypoid gears.…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Current approaches evaluate the form errors of a measured surface using either the Euclidean distances where Df − and Df + stand for the negative and posibetween the nominal and actual points (5, 6) or the tive deviations. As a matter of fact, DF is more useful distances projected to the normal direction to the nomthan Df, since it indicates whether the workpiece fulinal surface (7)(8)(9). However, both will inevitably result fils the quality requirement.…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation