2018
DOI: 10.1002/esp.4334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing spatially distributed sediment delivery ratios: inferring functional sediment connectivity from repeat high‐resolution digital elevation models

Abstract: High‐resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) from repeat LiDAR (light detection and ranging) or SfM (structure from motion) surveys have become an important tool in process geomorphology. The spatial pattern of negative and positive changes of surface elevation on raster DEMs of difference (DoD) can be interpreted in terms of geomorphic processes, and has been used for morphological budgeting. We show how the application of flow routing algorithms and flow accumulation opens new opportunities for the analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Or, if working the other way around, the large‐scale data can be made more detailed by using the small‐scaled data that is not a full cover map, but gives specific information that typifies the landscape. In the future, we have to conduct deeper research into how both scales can be combined, in order to describe more accurately the process of connectivity, which will enable better prediction of the functional connectivity processes, which conform surface landforms as equilibrium forms due to the interaction among the driving and resisting forces and are able to build a process‐based understanding (Jain et al ., ; Connecteur WG3 Think‐Tank Team et al ., ; Heckmann and Vericat, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or, if working the other way around, the large‐scale data can be made more detailed by using the small‐scaled data that is not a full cover map, but gives specific information that typifies the landscape. In the future, we have to conduct deeper research into how both scales can be combined, in order to describe more accurately the process of connectivity, which will enable better prediction of the functional connectivity processes, which conform surface landforms as equilibrium forms due to the interaction among the driving and resisting forces and are able to build a process‐based understanding (Jain et al ., ; Connecteur WG3 Think‐Tank Team et al ., ; Heckmann and Vericat, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, the main hypothesis of this paper is that the assessment of connectivity may elucidate unsolved geomorphic problems, especially regarding the interpretation of spatial and temporal paradoxes that may exist in sedimentary signals within catchments. Even if connectivity indices assess something for which we do not have any explicit measure, their theoretical development is required to go deeper in their interpretation (Heckmann & Vericat, ): the final aim being to integrate within models of erosion. From three study cases in various environmental regimes (high‐energy mountainous environment and agricultural lowland catchments), we (a) exhibit some misunderstood results in terms of sediment delivery and (b) develop various modeling procedures to test some hypothesis of interpretations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…functional connectivity), that will ultimately determine the frequency, distribution and magnitude of geomorphic processes (Bracken et al, 2015;Harvey, 2001;Wohl et al, 2018). Cavalli et al (2013) developed a raster-based Index of Connectivity (IC) that quantitatively assesses the spatial distribution of structural sediment connectivity, the potential of a landscape to be connected according to its attributes; while Heckmann and Vericat (2018) presented a method to infer on the functional sediment connectivity by the computing of spatially distributed sediment delivery ratios (SDR). Therefore, the approach presented here can be used to map main geomorphic process signatures and link these to the degree of connectivity to infer on source to sink trajectories at multiple spatial and temporal scales.…”
Section: Linking Processes Sediment Sources and Sinksmentioning
confidence: 99%