2013
DOI: 10.1137/120885991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the Fréchet Derivative of the Matrix Logarithm and Estimating the Condition Number

Abstract: Abstract. The most popular method for computing the matrix logarithm is the inverse scaling and squaring method, which is the basis of the recent algorithm of [A. H. Al-Mohy and N. J. Higham, Improved inverse scaling and squaring algorithms for the matrix logarithm, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 34 (2012), pp. C152-C169]. We show that by differentiating the latter algorithm a backward stable algorithm for computing the Fréchet derivative of the matrix logarithm is obtained. This algorithm requires complex arithmetic,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
94
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the importance of the (quasi-) triangular square root, which arises in algorithms for computing the matrix logarithm [2], [3], matrix pth roots [5], [8], and arbitrary matrix powers [13], this computational kernel is a strong contender for inclusion in any future extensions of the BLAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the importance of the (quasi-) triangular square root, which arises in algorithms for computing the matrix logarithm [2], [3], matrix pth roots [5], [8], and arbitrary matrix powers [13], this computational kernel is a strong contender for inclusion in any future extensions of the BLAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(In contrast, for the Schur-Parlett algorithm usually only the complex Schur form can be used [4], [14]). The logarithm evaluations are now done using the algorithm of Al-Mohy, Higham, and Relton [3], which is designed for real matrices and works entirely in real arithmetic.…”
Section: The Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and σ = 2 G · dev 3 (V − 11) + K · tr[V − 11] · 11 = 2 G · (V − 11) + Λ · tr[V − 11] · 11 (2) respectively, where U = √ F T F is the right Biot stretch tensor, V = √ F F T is the left Biot stretch tensor, σ is the Cauchy stress tensor, T Biot is the Biot stress tensor, dev 3 X = X − 1 3 tr(X) · 11 denotes the deviatoric part of X ∈ R 3×3 , K is the bulk modulus and G, Λ are the Lamé constants. According to Becker, it was already "universally acknowledged that either law [(1), (2)] is applicable only to strains so small that their squares are negligible" (3, p. 337).…”
Section: A Modern Interpretation Of Becker's Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Becker, it was already "universally acknowledged that either law [(1), (2)] is applicable only to strains so small that their squares are negligible" (3, p. 337). He gives a number of reasons for this rejection of Hooke's law as a model for finite deformations, including the fact that it allows for infinite distortions (det F = 0) under finite stresses (4, p. 337).…”
Section: A Modern Interpretation Of Becker's Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%