2014
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.610082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept of Bed Roughness Boundary Layer and Its Application to Bed Load Transport in Flow with Non-Submerged Vegetation

Abstract: Ecosystem conservation has become one of the purposes in river management as well as flood mitigation and water resources management, and understanding of river flow and morphology in a stream with vegetation becomes important. Recently 2D depth averaged analysis is familiar even in a stream with vegetation by taking account of form drag due to vegetation. However, the shear stress in vegetated area is not properly described because the resistance law due to bed roughness is not reasonably modified in vegetate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When Cr ≥ 0.13%, its regression correlation coefficient R 2 was always greater than 0.8835 (mean was approximately 0.9266); when Cr ≤ 0.11%, the correlation between the resistance coefficient and h/hv was weak, and its regression correlation coefficient R 2 was less than 0.5769 (mean was approximately 0.5109). In addition, the n value of all test points did not increase from zero, which was caused by the wall friction from the plexiglass plate laid on the test floor; Jin et al [25] and Jeon et al [68] also had similar ideas related to the flow resistance of partially submerged stems.…”
Section: The Relationship Between N and H/hv Under Different Density And Slope Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…When Cr ≥ 0.13%, its regression correlation coefficient R 2 was always greater than 0.8835 (mean was approximately 0.9266); when Cr ≤ 0.11%, the correlation between the resistance coefficient and h/hv was weak, and its regression correlation coefficient R 2 was less than 0.5769 (mean was approximately 0.5109). In addition, the n value of all test points did not increase from zero, which was caused by the wall friction from the plexiglass plate laid on the test floor; Jin et al [25] and Jeon et al [68] also had similar ideas related to the flow resistance of partially submerged stems.…”
Section: The Relationship Between N and H/hv Under Different Density And Slope Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 79%