Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3173733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing Disagreement in Qualitative Coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consensus coding is one of the most commonly used strategies to resolve disagreements in qualitative coding. 22 The team members discussed the pros and cons of the divergent themes to arrive at a consensus. Using a multidisciplinary team should reduce the chance of bias.…”
Section: 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consensus coding is one of the most commonly used strategies to resolve disagreements in qualitative coding. 22 The team members discussed the pros and cons of the divergent themes to arrive at a consensus. Using a multidisciplinary team should reduce the chance of bias.…”
Section: 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When coding was complete, discrepancies between the two coders were analyzed and discussed until consensus was achieved. The codebook was revised and interviews were recoded (Zade et al, 2018). A 97.23% agreement between coders was achieved with an average unweighted Cohen's kappa of 0.62, which falls in the substantial agreement category (Landis and Koch, 1977).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resultant themes were compared and contrasted, and any inconsistencies or deviant cases were discussed and reported. Disagreement between the researchers was settled by consensus 30 . Participants were invited to participate in member checking.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%