2002
DOI: 10.1176/appi.psy.43.6.472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Validity of Two Observer-Rated Alexithymia Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
3
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
21
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean alexithymia scores were comparable to other studies using clinical samples with the TSIA (Bagby et al, 2006) and the M-BIQ (Haviland et al, 2002), and slightly higher for the TAS-20 (Taylor et al, 2003) and the OAS (Haviland, Warren, Riggs, & Gallacher, 2001). Internal consistency was good for all total scores and most subscales.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean alexithymia scores were comparable to other studies using clinical samples with the TSIA (Bagby et al, 2006) and the M-BIQ (Haviland et al, 2002), and slightly higher for the TAS-20 (Taylor et al, 2003) and the OAS (Haviland, Warren, Riggs, & Gallacher, 2001). Internal consistency was good for all total scores and most subscales.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The few studies exploring the convergence among alexithymia measures do not provide consistent evidence of their convergent validity. Sometimes correlations with large effect sizes (r ≈ .50) are found Haviland, Warren, Riggs, & Nitch, 2002), yet more often correlations are in the small (r ≈ .10) to medium (r ≈ .30) effect size range with sometimes even negative correlations between subscales of different instruments (Berthoz, Haviland, Riggs, Perdereau, & Bungener, 2005;Lumley, Gustavson, Partridge, & Labouvie-Vief, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure was subsequently modified to become a 12-item rating scale that assesses both the lack of emotional awareness and the tendency for operational thinking . Several studies have used the original or modified BIQ as the criterion against which other alexithymia measures have been validated, perhaps because the BIQ captures the original, clinically based manifestations of alexithymia Haviland, Warren, Riggs, & Nitch, 2002). Yet, the BIQ is not widely used, probably because of the challenges of training, the time needed for an interview, the lack of a standardized interview to elicit the information, and problems in obtaining acceptable interrater reliability.…”
Section: The Assessment Of Alexithymiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 33-item Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS; Haviland, Warren, & Riggs, 2000) was developed on the assumption that alexithymia manifests in features-lack of insight, distance, somatizing, lack of humor, ridigity-that can be reliably reported by those who know the target person well such as family members, friends, or therapists. This measure has been shown to correlate highly with the modified BIQ (r = .69) when both measures were completed by the same therapists about the same patients (Haviland et al, 2002), and it also differentiates clinical from nonclinical cases (Haviland, Warren, Riggs, & Gallacher, 2001) and predicts a lack of interference on the emotional Stroop Test (Mueller, Alpers, & Reim, 2006). Generally, however, this relatively new measure has not been widely tested, so its validity for predicting criteria of clinical relevance is unknown.…”
Section: The Assessment Of Alexithymiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embora a TAS seja o instrumento de avaliação da alexitimia mais utilizado em pesquisas na atualidade, três outros instrumentos merecem referência: o Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire (Bermont & Vorst, 1998 citado por Taylor, Bagby & Luminet, 2000), de auto-relato; o California Q-set Alexithymia Prototype -CAQ-AP (Haviland, 1998;Haviland & Reise, 1996a), com duas versões: auto-relato e avaliado pelo observador; e a Observer Alexithymia Scale -OAS (Haviland, Warren & Riggs, 2000;Haviland, Warren, Riggs & Gallacher, 2001;Haviland, Warren, Riggs & Nitch, 2002). Vale destacar ainda, que a OAS foi desenvolvida a partir do CAQ-AP e se encontra em fase de adaptação e validação para o português (Carneiro, 2006).…”
unclassified