2004
DOI: 10.1002/mop.20318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductor‐loss reduction for high‐frequency transmission lines based on the magnetorheological‐fluid polishing method

Abstract: In this paper, a novel polishing method using magnetorheological (MR) fluid is presented in order to improve conductor‐surface roughness and achieve high‐frequency performance of the electroplated three‐dimensional (3D) CPW, where the MR fluid is utilized to efficiently polish uneven and imperfect conductor surfaces resulting from the widely used MEMS process. For the purpose of comparison, two 50Ω CPW lines on glass substrate are fabricated in order to validate the performance of the proposed polishing scheme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These surface defects cause localized scattering of the propagating wave leading to a reduction in its magnitude. Experiments in the RF show that transmission lines with surface roughness possess a larger attenuation constant when compared to transmission lines with less or no surface roughness [23,24].…”
Section: Simulation Of Cps Near-field Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These surface defects cause localized scattering of the propagating wave leading to a reduction in its magnitude. Experiments in the RF show that transmission lines with surface roughness possess a larger attenuation constant when compared to transmission lines with less or no surface roughness [23,24].…”
Section: Simulation Of Cps Near-field Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The rough and porous morphology of the line causes additional losses in the electrical characteristics and the losses increase as the operating frequency increases. 11,12…”
Section: ͑2͒mentioning
confidence: 99%