Condylar position assessed by magnetic resonance imaging after various bite position registrations

Kandasamy, Sanjivan; Boeddinghaus, Rudolf; Kruger, Estie

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.014

Cited by 43 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Several radiographic modalities have been used to determine condylar position, such as plain film radiography (Jos e Pereira et al, 2004;Serra and Gavião, 2006), conventional tomography (Major et al, 2002;Kikuchi et al, 2003;Wiese et al, 2008), computed tomography (CT) (Tsuruta et al, 2004;Okur et al, 2012), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (Ikeda and Kawamura, 2009;Ikeda et al, 2011;Cho and Jung, 2012;Ikeda and Kawamura, 2013), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Incesu et al, 2004;Robinson de Senna et al, 2009;Kandasamy et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Association between mandibular condylar position and clinical dysfunction index

Paknahad

Shahidi

2015

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Association between mandibular condylar position and clinical dysfunction index

Paknahad

Shahidi

2015

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…4,9,10 With the evolution of radiographic exams like computerized tomographies (CT), including the new 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) it is now possible to radiographically examine the position of the condyle. [11][12][13] The most common method found in the literature to determine this position is the assessment of the joint space measurements, which are the radiographic space found between the condyle and the glenoid fossa where the articular disk is placed. 14 A variation on the values of these measurements suggest a displacement of the condyle and so, the determination of the "gold standard" for these values would be a very important tool to determine any variation to the condyle position.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sagittal joint spaces of the temporomandibular joint: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Martins

Silva

Pires

et al. 2015

Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

r e v p o r t e s t o m a t o l m e d d e n t c i r m a x i l o f a c . 2 0 1 5;5 6(2):80-88 Review Meta-analysis a b s t r a c tThe aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the sagittal joint spaces measurements of the temporomandibular joint. An electronic database search was performed with the terms "condylar position"; "joint space" AND "TMJ". The risk of bias of each study was assessed with "Cochrane risk of bias tool". The values used in the meta-analysis were the joint space measurements and their differences between the right and left joint. From the initial search 2706 articles were retrieved. Eighteen articles classified for final review. Only one study was classified as having high level of evidence. Seventeen of the reviewed studies were included in the meta-analysis concluding that the mean sagittal joint space values were: anterior joint space 1.86 mm, superior 2.36 mm and posterior 2.22 mm. However, the analysis also showed high levels of heterogeneity. Right and left comparison has shown statistically significant differences. © 2015 Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Espaços articulares sagitais da articulação temporomandibular: revisão sistemática e meta-análisePalavras chave: Articulação temporomandibular Revisão Meta-análise r e s u m o O objetivo deste estudo foi realizar uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise sobre os espaços articulares sagitais da articulação temporomandibular. Foi realizada uma pesquisa eletrónica com os termos "condylar position", "joint space"AND"TMJ". O nível de evidên-cia de cada estudo foi avaliado com "Cochrane risk of bias tool". Os valores sumariados na meta-análise foram os espaços articulares e a diferença entre a articulação direita e esquerda. article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).r e v p o r t e s t o m a t o l m e d d e n t c i r m a x i l o f a c . 2 0 1 5;5 6(2):80-88 81 Da pesquisa inicial resultaram 2076 artigos dos quais 18 foram selecionados para a revisão. Apenas um estudo foi considerado de elevado nível de evidência. Foram incluídos na metaanálise 17 dos artigos da revisão concluindo-se que, os valores médios para os espaços articulares sagitais foram: 1.86 mm para o anterior, 2.36 mm para o superior e 2.22 mm para o posterior. No entanto, a análise revelou ainda grande heterogeneidade nos resultados dos estudos avaliados. Verificaram-se diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre as articulaç ões esquerda e direita.

show abstract

“…After chilling the wax register in cold water to harden it, the accuracy of the record was checked in the mouth. The Roth power centric technique [ 23 ] was used to register the CR immediately after neuromuscular deprogramming with the patient relaxed and reclined at 45º. An anterior acrylic device was interposed between the dental arches for 25 min.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mandible was guided during closure, and when the anterior teeth were brought into fit with the corresponding anterior wax indentations, the patient was asked to bite firmly. As the posterior wax section was softened, muscular strength helped to adjust the vertical intra-articular condylar position [ 23 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%