2017
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2017.74383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the R Lation Between Sex and Morphology of Maxilla in Patients With Impacted Maxillary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, results of the previous studies carried out with various dissimilar diagnostic records (study casts, 7,9,10,13,14,16,18 , posteroanterior x-rays 8 and CBCT 5,14,17 are in sharp contrast to our results. Several studies 7,10,13,14,16 failed to record differences in transverse width between the impaction groups (buccal impaction and palatal impaction) and the control group. So, they stated that, maxillary transverse discrepancy was not considered as a causative factor contributing to maxillary canine impaction, in addition, the presence of impacted canine has no effect on maxillary width.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, results of the previous studies carried out with various dissimilar diagnostic records (study casts, 7,9,10,13,14,16,18 , posteroanterior x-rays 8 and CBCT 5,14,17 are in sharp contrast to our results. Several studies 7,10,13,14,16 failed to record differences in transverse width between the impaction groups (buccal impaction and palatal impaction) and the control group. So, they stated that, maxillary transverse discrepancy was not considered as a causative factor contributing to maxillary canine impaction, in addition, the presence of impacted canine has no effect on maxillary width.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…So, they concluded that, early treatment of transverse deficiency of the maxillary arch may decrease the probability of maxillary canine impaction. However, Fattahi et al, 13 and Refaat and El-Desouky 14 demonstrated that, no statistically significant difference in inter molar width, inter premolar width, inter canine width, between the impaction groups (buccal and palatal impaction) and the control group. Furthermore, Kim et al, 15 assessed the relationship between the position of maxillary impacted canines and the morphology of the maxilla using arch length / inter molar width x 100 as index of maxillary arch shape and palatal vault depth / inter molar width x 100 as index of palatal shape.…”
Section: Cone-beam Computed Tomography Evaluation Of the Relationship Between Maxillary Transverse Dimensions And Maxillary Impacted Canimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Refaat and El-Desouky [24] reported that female patients with palatal MIC had a deeper palatal structure than those with buccal MIC. According to the researchers, the strength of the relationship between impacted canine position and palatal depth was much higher in the female patients than the male patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palatal height analysis: Figure 5 describes the palatal height measurement. 25,26 PHI was computed by dividing the PH by the IMW using the following formula: PHI = PH x 100/IMW. 20…”
Section: Impacted Canines Related To the Arch Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arch form was evaluated by drawing a dental central line passing through the pulp chamber of all teeth in the axial view (Figure 6). 25,26 The arch forms and dimensions of the study and control groups were compared. The landmarks of interest were digitized, and transverse measurements were recorded after image acquisition.…”
Section: Impacted Canines Related To the Dental Arch Formmentioning
confidence: 99%