Conflict and Computation on Wikipedia: A Finite-State Machine Analysis of Editor Interactions

Abstract

Abstract:What is the boundary between a vigorous argument and a breakdown of relations? What drives a group of individuals across it? Taking Wikipedia as a test case, we use a hidden Markov model to approximate the computational structure and social grammar of more than a decade of cooperation and conflict among its editors. Across a wide range of pages, we discover a bursty war/peace structure where the systems can become trapped, sometimes for months, in a computational subspace associated with significantly higher levels of conflict-tracking "revert" actions. Distinct patterns of behavior characterize the lower-conflict subspace, including tit-for-tat reversion. While a fraction of the transitions between these subspaces are associated with top-down actions taken by administrators, the effects are weak. Surprisingly, we find no statistical signal that transitions are associated with the appearance of particularly anti-social users, and only weak association with significant news events outside the system. These findings are consistent with transitions being driven by decentralized processes with no clear locus of control. Models of belief revision in the presence of a common resource for information-sharing predict the existence of two distinct phases: a disordered high-conflict phase, and a frozen phase with spontaneously-broken symmetry. The bistability we observe empirically may be a consequence of editor turn-over, which drives the system to a critical point between them.

The Complementary Importance of Static Structure and Temporal Dynamics in Teamwork Communication

“…Going forward, the detected role of stationarity shows that it is essential to further deepen our understanding of the issue of stationarity for the categorical variables of communicative exchanges (as for example done in DeDeo, 2016). This should consider the length and type of the involved time series.…”

“…What complicates things is that social dynamics are almost always changing while unfolding. Their non-stationarity originates endogenously, through life cycles (Ellis and Fisher, 1975;Fisher, 1970;Poole and Roth, 1989) or the ambition of social agents to improve the process (Hilbert, 2014;Madsen, Flyverbom, Hilbert, and Ruppert, 2016), or exogenously through external shocks (DeDeo, 2016;Poole et al, 2000). Given the useful properties of stationarity and its rare appearance, it is often swept under the methodological rug and no statistical tests are executed, not even when published under the scrutiny of the world's most highly ranked Journals, (Song, Qu, Blumm, and Barabási, 2010).…”

The More You Know, the More You Can Grow: An Information Theoretic Approach to Growth in the Information Age

“…This does not mean that information theory does not provide the tools for exploring it. Actually, information theory can be used to identify change points in endogenous and exogenous dynamics [75]. It can also be used to model a truly bidirectional communication between the growing population and its environment.…”

Understanding and coping with extremism in an online collaborative environment: A data-driven modeling

“…Such cases have been studied empirically by various groups. The bursty nature of editorial wars and the separation between peace and war phases in a dynamical framework, are studied in [12] and [13]. More detailed analysis on dyadic interactions between editors and the role of social status are presented in [14].…”