2009
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2009.37308255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflicting Logics, Mechanisms of Diffusion, and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields

Abstract: We examine the evolution of a new population of organizations (state offices of dispute resolution) in an emerging institutional field, focusing on how actions at multiple levels interact recursively to enable multiple logics to diffuse. Logics became institutionalized as organizational practices within the field of alternative dispute resolution through four diffusion mechanisms: transformation, grafting, bridging, and exit. By describing the interplay among entrepreneurial efforts, strategic responses to res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
309
1
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(116 reference statements)
7
309
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, as sharing platforms often appear to face situations of uncertainty about which institutional logic is of interest to their constituency groups, they frequently apply complexity absorbing strategies, explicitly communicating multiple logics in parallel. The vague term of sharing appears to facilitate this bridging mechanism (Purdy and Gray 2009;Smets et al 2015), whereby stakeholders can 'pick and choose' logics that are of interest to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, as sharing platforms often appear to face situations of uncertainty about which institutional logic is of interest to their constituency groups, they frequently apply complexity absorbing strategies, explicitly communicating multiple logics in parallel. The vague term of sharing appears to facilitate this bridging mechanism (Purdy and Gray 2009;Smets et al 2015), whereby stakeholders can 'pick and choose' logics that are of interest to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be that certain users are attracted by the combination of logics, for instance by enjoying cost/ convenience benefits coupled with the fascination of the green benefits. In these situations, segmentation strategies do not work, and the platforms' decision makers have to embrace a different approach, resembling the bridging mechanism documented elsewhere in the literature (Purdy and Gray 2009;Smets et al 2015) and discussed in Sect. 2.4.…”
Section: Absorbing Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent research on conflicting institutional logics, especially in the context of emerging fields, provides a case in point (Navis andGlynn 2010, Purdy andGray 2009). This research suggests that in such fields, institutional arrangements themselves can exhibit considerable levels of uncertainty.…”
Section: Implications For Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important line of work that deserves to be revisited with a visual research agenda in mind is the theorization and diffusion of ideas and concepts (e.g., Strang & Meyer, 1993). Strang and Soule (1998) point out that it is not practices that flow, but theorized models and their framings -which renders the role of visualization in these processes immediately obvious: Visualization and multimodal communication can be as decisive for the speed and success of diffusion as are verbal accounts and frames, especially when ideas and concepts spread 'over contested terrain' (e.g., Fiss & Zajac, 2004Meyer & Höllerer, 2010;Purdy & Gray, 2009). Thus, not only is theorization very likely multimodal, visuality is also an important mode of translating global practices into local settings.…”
Section: Cultural Entrepreneurship and Strategic Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%