2022
DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.2098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital cytomegalovirus surveillance in the United States

Abstract: Background Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is not a nationally notifiable condition, and little is known about how U.S. health departments (HDs) currently conduct cCMV surveillance. Methods We surveyed U.S. HDs that conduct cCMV surveillance or screening activities identified through a web‐based assessment. Meetings were held with each HD to enhance our understanding of survey responses. Results Ten states are systematically collecting cCMV case data to track cCMV cases during early infancy and to provide re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among VLBW infants, we observed higher reporting rates among those born to Hispanic mothers and Asian or Pacific Islander mothers. Although our study does not distinguish congenital from postnatal infection, unpublished national data indicate ~90% of infants tested for CMV in the NICU had specimens collected within 21 days of life (Raines et al, 2023). A prior study in California noted higher prevalence of congenital CMV infection among infants born to Hispanic and Black mothers (Kharrazi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among VLBW infants, we observed higher reporting rates among those born to Hispanic mothers and Asian or Pacific Islander mothers. Although our study does not distinguish congenital from postnatal infection, unpublished national data indicate ~90% of infants tested for CMV in the NICU had specimens collected within 21 days of life (Raines et al, 2023). A prior study in California noted higher prevalence of congenital CMV infection among infants born to Hispanic and Black mothers (Kharrazi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The work from the CPQCC and HRIF program may be informative to the wider implementation of congenital CMV surveillance efforts by health departments. Only 10 U.S. states conduct congenital CMV surveillance and case definitions are not standardized (Raines et al, 2022). Collecting data on clinical signs at birth, laboratory results, including specimen type, age at specimen collection, and testing methods, and outcomes such as hearing loss, would be important to accurately classify cases of congenital CMV and document the disease burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%