Connective tissue graft plus resin‐modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non‐carious cervical lesion: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial

Santamaria, Milton; Ambrosano, Gláucia María Bovi; Casati, Márcio Zaffalon; Nociti, Francisco Humberto; Sallum, Antônio Wilson; Sallum, Enílson Antônio

doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2009.01441.x

Cited by 64 publications

(212 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

176

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This may have facilitated proper soft tissue healing over the apical aspect to the restoration margin [15,16]. These findings corroborate the observation that minimal inflammation is observed following root coverage and CEJ reconstruction when a proper finishing of the dental material is accomplished [17,18].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Classification & Prevalence of Dental Surface Defects in Areas of Gingival Recession- A Clinical Study

Bhusari¹,

Agrawal

Upadhyay

et al. 2014

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Apical migration of the gingival margin beyond the cement-enamel junction (CEJ) is called as gingival recession. Various classifications of gingival recession have been proposed to evaluate different degrees of damage to periodontal tissues, but do not consider the condition of the exposed root surface: presence of an identifiable CEJ and presence of root abrasion. Sometimes these lesions may be associated with enamel abrasion. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to propose the new classification of dental surface defects in gingival recession area.Methods: Two factors were evaluated to set up a classification system: presence (A) or absence (B) of CEJ and presence (+) or absence (-) of dental surface discrepancy caused by abrasion (step). Four classes (A+, A-, B+, and B-) were identified on the basis of these variables. The classification was used on 1,000 gingival recessions to examine the distribution of the four classes.Results: Out of 1,000 exposed root surfaces, 380 showed an identifiable CEJ associated with step (Class A+, 38%); 280 an identifiable CEJ without any associated step (Class A-, 28%); 200 an unidentifiable CEJ with a step (Class B+, 20%); and 140 an unidentifiable CEJ without any associated step (Class B-, 14%). Conclusion:The proposed classification describes the dental surface defects that are of paramount importance in diagnosing gingival recession areas which might help in selecting the definite treatment approach.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Classification & Prevalence of Dental Surface Defects in Areas of Gingival Recession- A Clinical Study

Bhusari¹,

Agrawal

Upadhyay

et al. 2014

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This surgery requires only a single surgical site, and it is recommended for the treatment of areas with Miller Class I recession, in the case of recessions up to 3 mm, where there is sufficient keratinized mucosa apically from the gingival margin and tissue thickness of at least 1 mm as it was observed in this case 20. However, it is not indicated for patients with a shallow vestibule, or thin gingival tissue 23. It is necessary to emphasize the importance of adequate surgical planning, considering multiple factors such as the type of recession, quantity and quality of keratinized tissue, tooth position in the arch, flap type, and degree of bone loss among other factors, in order to gain a favorable clinical outcome.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of conventional and semilunar coronally positioned flap techniques for root coverage in teeth with cervical abrasion restored with pink resin

Santos

Storrer

Cunha

et al. 2017

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gingival recession is the most common mucogingival defect, characterized by apical migration of the gingival margin from the cementoenamel junction and root exposure. Several surgical techniques are reported for the treatment of gingival recession. Here we present a comparison of the conventional (coronally advanced flap) and semilunar coronally positioned flap techniques for root coverage in teeth with cervical abrasion restored with pink resin that mimics the color of the gingiva. Although the conventional technique is more predictable, we found that both techniques were effective in achieving satisfactory and esthetic root coverage.

show abstract

“…an aditional question may arise, how these restoration can be removed/ changed?). Also, SCTG + CAF seems to perform better than CAF [ 42 ]. Thus, it seems more advantageous to treat the recession fi rst (i.e.…”

Section: Additional Conditions To Be Considered During Preparing the mentioning

confidence: 92%

Rationale for the Surgical Treatment of Single and Multiple Recession-Type Defects

Chambrone¹,

Frias

Gonzalez³

et al. 2015

Evidence-Based Periodontal and Peri-Implant Plastic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Connective tissue graft plus resin‐modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non‐carious cervical lesion: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial

Abstract: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that both procedures provide comparable soft tissue coverage. The presence of the glass ionomer restoration may not prevent the root coverage achieved by CTG.

Cited by 64 publications

References 17 publications

Classification & Prevalence of Dental Surface Defects in Areas of Gingival Recession- A Clinical Study

Classification & Prevalence of Dental Surface Defects in Areas of Gingival Recession- A Clinical Study

Comparison of conventional and semilunar coronally positioned flap techniques for root coverage in teeth with cervical abrasion restored with pink resin

Rationale for the Surgical Treatment of Single and Multiple Recession-Type Defects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About