Conodont biostratigraphy and microfacies of the Late Devonian to Mississippian Milivojevića Kamenjar section (Družetić, NW Serbia)

Sudar, Milan; Novak, Matevž; Korn, Dieter; Jovanović, Divna

doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1690

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In Jadar Block (NW Serbia), this conodont first occurs together with other species of ornamented Lochriea from the Hypergoniatites-Ferganoceras or Lusitanoceras-Lyrogoniatites ammonoid zones, which is at least P2a ( Fig. 2; Sudar et al 2018).…”

Section: Progress In Establishing the Vis Ean-serpukhovian Boundary Amentioning

confidence: 97%

Foraminifers of the Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary interval in Western Palaeotethys: a review

Cózar

Vachard²,

Aretz

et al. 2019

LET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A detailed revision of foraminiferal zonal schemes in sections throughout Europe and North Africa for the Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary interval suggests that several foraminiferal taxa might have the potential to form reliable markers throughout the Palaeotethys. This would support the currently investigated boundary definition based on the First Appearance Datum of the conodont Lochriea ziegleri. However, correlation of these foraminiferal markers in the Western Palaeotethys region has encountered several problems, partly arising from taxonomic issues, but mainly because of apparent discrepancies between the First Occurrence Data (FOD). Analysis of the available foraminiferal data has revealed that some taxa show marked delays in their FODs, due to the timing of westward dispersal within the Palaeotethys, emanating from a probable source in eastern Russia. As a result of this investigation, two dispersal routes have been identified, a northern branch and a southern branch. In general, the displacements within the southern branch occurred more rapidly than in the northern branch. In addition to different dispersal routes, separation of the main foraminiferal markers in stratigraphical sections from different regions can result from isolation of shallow‐water facies of the inner platform from those of relatively deeper‐water settings in the outer platform, the latter showing more consistent foraminiferal FODs. The differences in palaeobathymetry and associated energy levels have enabled two foraminiferal zonal schemes to be distinguished for the Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary interval in the Western Palaeotethys, one for the inner platform and a second one for the outer platform.

show abstract

Section: Progress In Establishing the Vis Ean-serpukhovian Boundary Amentioning

confidence: 97%

Foraminifers of the Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary interval in Western Palaeotethys: a review

Cózar

Vachard²,

Aretz

et al. 2019

LET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A similar scenario is also observed in the Milivojevića Kamenjar section, where nearly all the ornamented Lochriea first occur together in less than 1 m of strata, with a major lithological change from light-grey thick-bedded to massive micritic limestones passing into well-bedded nodular micritic limestones (Sudar et al . 2018).…”

Section: Evaluating the Diachronism In The Fods Of Lochriea Zieglerimentioning

confidence: 99%

Foraminifers and conodonts in the Danlu section, South China: implications for the Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary (Mississippian)

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary is poorly defined in South China, hampering regional and global stratigraphical correlations. The foraminiferal and conodont distribution of the Baping Formation in the carbonate-slope Danlu section permits the recognition of an interval from the middle Viséan to the uppermost Serpukhovian in a continuous succession. The base of the Serpukhovian in Danlu is recognized by the first occurrences of Janischewskina delicata, Howchinia subplana and questionable ‘Millerella’ tortula. At a slightly younger level, the conodont Lochriea ziegleri is first recorded. A calibration on the first occurrence of L. ziegleri in different basins at a global scale has been revised compared to auxiliary markers within the ammonoids and foraminifers. The late occurrence of L. ziegleri in the Danlu section also supports a lack of synchronicity in the global first occurrence of this taxon. This study calls for the recognition of a new base for the Serpukhovian under a far better correlation between different zonal schemes and fossil groups.

show abstract

“…The lower boundary of this zone, which is close to the base of the early Viséan, is marked by the FAD of Locheria commutata Branson & Mehl, 1941, and the second conodont found in this level is Gnathodus bilineatus bilineatus Roundy, 1926. Both taxa were recorded as index species of early Viséan (Meischner and Nemyrovska 1999;Nemyrovska et al 2006;Sudar et al 2018).…”

Section: Scaliognathus Anchoralis-doliognathus Latus Zone (Samples A3mentioning

confidence: 99%

Late Devonian (Famennian) to Carboniferous (Mississippian-Pennsylvanian) conodonts from the Anarak section, Central Iran

Sattari

Bahrami

Königshof

et al. 2021

Palaeobio Palaeoenv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A relatively complete conodont record from Famennian to the Mississippian/Pennsylvanian boundary was investigated in the Anarak section, Central Iran. The studied interval belongs to the Bahram, Shishtu, Ghaleh and Absheni formations. The Famennian part of the section (Bahram Formation) ranges from the Palmatolepis triangularis Zone into the Bispathodus ultimus Zone. Not all conodont zones could be defined due to the lack of indicative species. Furthermore, it seems likely that a hiatus occurs around the Devonian/Carboniferous (D/C) boundary (most probably from the Siphonodella praesulcata to the ?Siphonodella sulcata–early Siphonodella crenulata conodont zones) based on the lack of stratigraphically important conodonts as well as on sedimentological criteria. The lack of representative siphonodellids and protognathodids at the base of the Mississippian prevents detailed stratigraphic position of the D/C boundary. Lower Carboniferous (Mississippian) rocks are characterized by red nodular limestone which is unique in comparison with other studied sections of the same age in Central Iran. Within the studied section, we could define the Mississippian/Pennsylvanian boundary. The mid-Carboniferous boundary was defined by the occurrence of Declinognathus noduliferus s.l. Conodont biofacies changes (Mississippian genera Gnathodus and Lochriea have been replaced by Pennsylvanian genera Declinognathus and Idiognathodus) are recognized in this section as well.

show abstract

Conodont biostratigraphy and microfacies of the Late Devonian to Mississippian Milivojevića Kamenjar section (Družetić, NW Serbia)

Cited by 8 publications

References 16 publications

Foraminifers of the Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary interval in Western Palaeotethys: a review

Foraminifers of the Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary interval in Western Palaeotethys: a review

Foraminifers and conodonts in the Danlu section, South China: implications for the Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary (Mississippian)

Late Devonian (Famennian) to Carboniferous (Mississippian-Pennsylvanian) conodonts from the Anarak section, Central Iran

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About