Conscientious Refusals in Pharmacy Practice

Deans, Zuzana

doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0979-6_10

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[5,8] CO in pharmacy practice has received comparatively less academic attention, especially in the UK. [8][9][10][11] Yet, pharmacists are as likely as other health professionals to have personal ethical commitments which affect their ability to provide a particular service. Such matters are addressed in many pharmacy regulatory codes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

UK pharmacists’ experiences and perceptions of conflict between personal ethical commitments and professional obligations, as set out in professional guidance

Fovargue

Neal

2022

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In 2017, the General Pharmaceutical Council (UK) issued new Standards for Pharmacy Professionals and supporting guidance, Guidance on Religion, Personal Values and Beliefs, to help pharmacists when their religion, personal values or beliefs might impact on their provision of services. Objective To understand how pharmacists in the UK experience and perceive conflicts between their personal ethical commitments (matters of conscience) and professional obligations in guidance from their regulator. Methods Twenty-four registered pharmacists were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Key findings Participants were generally aware of the Council’s consultations and responded if they had something to say, or it was their role to respond. Age and stage, confidence, and workload impacted on whether participants responded to Council consultations, and, therefore, on the range of views heard. The professional obligation to provide person-centred care (PCC) was central to participants’ practice, and personal ethical commitments were important to some. Conflicts between such commitments and professional obligations were rare, and it was generally believed that the former should be accommodated, as far as possible, but not imposed on others. Personal ethical commitments could affect PCC, and some suggested that the Council’s Guidance was not clear on pharmacists’ responsibilities in this regard. Conclusions Clarification on the role of personal ethical commitments in professional practice, particularly in relation to providing PCC, would be useful. Clearer guidance on how pharmacists should manage perceived conflicts between their personal ethical commitments and their professional obligations would also be welcomed.

show abstract