Consent Timing and Experience: Modifiable Factors That May Influence Interest in Clinical Research

Abstract

Purpose: Low rates of participation in cancer clinical trials have been attributed to patient, institutional, and study characteristics. However, few studies have examined factors related to the consent process. We therefore evaluated the impact of consent timing and experience on markers of patient interest in research. Methods:We performed a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in a cancer center tissue repository. During enrollment, patients were asked if they were willing to be contacted in the future to provide medical follow-up information and/or to participate in other clinical research. We analyzed the association between patient responses to these questions and consent process factors using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.Results: Of 922 patients evaluated, 85% agreed to be contacted to provide follow-up information, and 83% agreed to be contacted to participate in future research studies. In univariate analysis, willingness to be contacted for future research was associated with consenter experience (P ϭ .01) and had a trend toward association with the timing of enrollment in relation to diagnosis (P ϭ .08), but it was not associated with patient sex, race, or diagnosis. In multivariate analysis, responses remained associated with consenter experience (P ϭ .02). Conclusion:Factors related to the consent process, including consenter experience and timing of study enrollment, are significantly associated with or have a trend toward association with markers of patient interest in clinical research. These understudied and potentially modifiable variables warrant further evaluation.

Nurse leaders’ perceptions of the ethical recruitment of study subjects in clinical research

“…Practical issues around planning nurses’ working shifts, timing recruitment (Gerber et al . ) and carrying out recruitment separately from medical procedures (Halkoaho et al . ) are some of the factors that impact on ethical recruitment.…”

Increased Patient Enrollment to a Randomized Surgical Trial Through Equipoise Polling of an Expert Surgeon Panel

“…Aspects of study conduct (eg, reporting of protocol violations) may improve during a trial and improved patient consent to participation in noninterventional clinical research was reported in 1 study for more experienced consenters. 17 We tested for, but did not find any evidence for such a learning curve.…”

Thoracic Oncology Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria and Requirements Continue to Increase in Number and Complexity

“…1,2 This low rate of enrollment reflects a wide range of factors, including patient trust in the healthcare system and understanding of study protocols; physician attitudes toward patients and communication skills; and experience of clinical research staff. 2–10 Limited trial availability also hinders enrollment at many centers. 11,12 Yet, even at sites heavily invested in clinical research that maintain diverse clinical trial portfolios and attract motivated populations, only a small minority of patients are enrolled in research studies.…”