2016
DOI: 10.1002/eap.1401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation implications of a lack of relationship between baseline glucocorticoids and fitness in a wild passerine

Abstract: The application of physiological measures to conservation monitoring has been gaining momentum and, while a suite of physiological traits are available to ascertain disturbance and condition in wildlife populations, glucocorticoids (i.e., GCs; cortisol and corticosterone) are the most heavily employed. The interpretation of GC levels as sensitive indicators of population change necessitates that GCs and metrics of population persistence are linked. However, the relationship between GCs and fitness may be highl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(279 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glucocorticoid hormones (GCs) are particularly appropriate indicators of short-term physiological responses to variable environmental conditions due to their critical role in allostasis (Sapolsky et al 2000, Wikelski and Cooke 2006, Busch and Hayward 2009. Chronically elevated GCs are usually considered maladaptive (Bonier et al 2009), although support for this hypothesis is mixed (e.g., Thierry et al 2013, Burtka et al 2016, Hansen et al 2016, Madliger and Love 2016. In general, baseline GCs are thought to reflect the social, environmental, and energetic challenges to homeostasis faced by individuals (Sapolsky et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glucocorticoid hormones (GCs) are particularly appropriate indicators of short-term physiological responses to variable environmental conditions due to their critical role in allostasis (Sapolsky et al 2000, Wikelski and Cooke 2006, Busch and Hayward 2009. Chronically elevated GCs are usually considered maladaptive (Bonier et al 2009), although support for this hypothesis is mixed (e.g., Thierry et al 2013, Burtka et al 2016, Hansen et al 2016, Madliger and Love 2016. In general, baseline GCs are thought to reflect the social, environmental, and energetic challenges to homeostasis faced by individuals (Sapolsky et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study population, nestlings with lower body mass have lower first-year survival (Harriman 2014). Although the relationship between CORT and individual quality is no doubt context dependent and need not always be negative (Bonier et al 2009;Rivers et al 2012;Madliger and Love 2016), our predictions are based on previous work with the same study population showing that higher levels of CORT from feathers were associated with poorer nestling quality (reduced nestling growth and fledging success; Fairhurst et al 2013), as well as being hatched and raised in plywood boxes (Fairhurst et al 2012a). Here, we also measured levels of CORT in nestling feathers (CORT f ), which provides an integrated measure of CORT during feather growth (Bortolotti et al 2008;Fairhurst et al 2013;HĂ”rak et al 2013;Jenni-Eiermann et al 2015; for a review see Romero and Fairhurst 2016) that reflects energy management during development (Johns et al 2018) and, thus, is a convenient way of assessing nestling quality during early life in Tree Swallows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there may exist no consistent relationship between CORT and fitness, due to a variety of factors masking directionality ( Madliger and Love, 2016a ). For example, a lack of relationship could be due to different functions of CORT; when resources are plentiful, elevated CORT could stimulate energy mobilization and parental provisioning; however, CORT could also be elevated in parents experiencing stressors ( Vitousek et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%