2006
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services

Abstract: Despite increasing attention to the human dimension of conservation projects, a rigorous, systematic methodology for planning for ecosystem services has not been developed. This is in part because flows of ecosystem services remain poorly characterized at local-to-regional scales, and their protection has not generally been made a priority. We used a spatially explicit conservation planning framework to explore the trade-offs and opportunities for aligning conservation goals for biodiversity with six ecosystem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
683
4
32

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 946 publications
(735 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
16
683
4
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Although developing a greater understanding of temporal changes in ESVs is important, increasing interest has been focused on determining how ESVs change spatially by identifying 'hotspots' of ecosystem services that are important for biodiversity and provide multiple ecosystem services (Chan et al, 2006;Egoh et al, 2009;Naidoo et al, 2008;Turner et al, 2007). These spatial studies may provide a series of useful tools that can effectively integrate ecosystem services into planned or current conservation programs (Naidoo et al, 2008), assess the effects of implementing ecological policies, and identify priority areas for ecosystem-service management (Egoh et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although developing a greater understanding of temporal changes in ESVs is important, increasing interest has been focused on determining how ESVs change spatially by identifying 'hotspots' of ecosystem services that are important for biodiversity and provide multiple ecosystem services (Chan et al, 2006;Egoh et al, 2009;Naidoo et al, 2008;Turner et al, 2007). These spatial studies may provide a series of useful tools that can effectively integrate ecosystem services into planned or current conservation programs (Naidoo et al, 2008), assess the effects of implementing ecological policies, and identify priority areas for ecosystem-service management (Egoh et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make better decisions, a systematic account of the relationships between ecosystem management and the generated ecosystem services is needed (de Groot et al 2010). There are recent assessments of natural capital and ecosystem services (e.g., Blashke 2005;Haines-Young et al 2006;Chan et al 2006;Naidoo and Ricketts 2006;Gimona and Van der Horst 2007;Egoh et al 2008;Meyer and Grabaum 2008;Grêt-Regamey et al 2008;Naidoo et al 2008;Raymond et al 2009). However, they are not suitable for representing services at a single location or assessing the spatial and temporal services change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies identify recreation as a threat to the vitality of the ecosystem, properly planned and managed recreation can help provide a better understanding of ecological values in the area where recreation can become one of the instruments of conservation of valuable habitats (Dolnicar et al 2008). Regarding outdoor recreation, we used some of the conclusions reached in previous studies, primarily Chan et al (2006) and Weyland & Laterra (2014). According to these authors, the possibility of accomplishing outdoor recreation is conditioned by the degree of naturalness of the landscapes and the presence of NSN elements in the landscape structure.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Of Connectivity As a Multifunctional mentioning
confidence: 99%