Considerating Subjectivity in Softwares Evaluation

Hû, Olivier; Trigano, Philippe; Crozat, Stéphane

doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4295-3_29

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is named The Evaluation Methodology for Ship's Planned Maintenance System Database (Stazić et al 2017). The tool has been created with intention to give a strict guideline during the Evaluation of Ship's Planned Maintenance System databases, and by enforcing some rules to decrease the subjectivity (Hû et al 1999) of the evaluator (researcher). The Methodology has been tested in operation on several databases and the functionality of the Methodology has been established, as well as reliability of obtained results (Stazić et al 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The decrease of the subjectivity of the evaluator should be a side effect of the usage of the Methodology. A research has been performed by the authors of the paper to establish how much evaluator's subjectivity (Hû et al 1999) affects the evaluation of ship's Planned Maintenance System databases and to establish how much the Evaluation Methodology for Ship's Planned Maintenance System Database (Stazić et al 2017) is helping to decrease that subjectivity and consequently creating evaluation results more credible. The research has been arranged using real Shipping Company Planned Maintenance System databases.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Testing of the evaluation methodology for Ship's Planned Maintenance System Database

Stazić¹,

Stanivuk²,

Mihanović³

2019

J Appl Eng Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ship's Planned Maintenance Systems are in use for a long period of time, but database quality, confi guration and content are still not standardized. Factors affecting the database quality, confi guration and content are the quality of raw data, experience and knowledge of database creation team, importance given to computerized PMS and care assigned to evaluation of fi nished product. Evaluation of fi nished product, i.e. ship's Planned Maintenance System Database is an action requiring specifi ed knowledge and qualifi cations, as well as experience in performing the task. Even when evaluators fulfi ll all needed requirements, credibility of the obtained results is questionable due to their subjectivity. One of the tools to decrease that problem is the Evaluation Methodology for Ship's Planned Maintenance System Database. A research, described in the paper, has been performed to test that aspect of the Methodology. Three Ships Planned Maintenance System Databases were evaluated by four different evaluators, fi rst using only their experience, then using the Methodology. Results of the research are presented in the paper together with comparison of fi ndings. All presented points that usage of the Methodology is a necessity during evaluations of ship's Planned Maintenance System Databases.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testing of the evaluation methodology for Ship's Planned Maintenance System Database

Stazić¹,

Stanivuk²,

Mihanović³

2019

J Appl Eng Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

How to combine objectives and methods of evaluation in iterative ILE design: lessons learned from designing Ambre-add

Nogry

Jean-Daubias

Guin

2012

Interactive Learning Environments

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article deals with evaluating an interactive learning environment (ILE) during the iterative-design process. Various aspects of the system must be assessed and a number of evaluation methods are available. In designing the ILE AMBREadd, several techniques were combined to test and refine the system. In particular, we point out the merits of combining measures of the ILE's impact on learning with analyses of the learner's activity. In this article, the approach used to evaluate AMBRE-add is described and analyzed, and its advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Then, a general procedure for evaluating ILEs during iterative design is proposed.

show abstract

Considerating Subjectivity in Softwares Evaluation

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Testing of the evaluation methodology for Ship's Planned Maintenance System Database

Testing of the evaluation methodology for Ship's Planned Maintenance System Database

How to combine objectives and methods of evaluation in iterative ILE design: lessons learned from designing Ambre-add

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About