2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-022-07415-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion During Cardiac Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decade, left atrial appendage closure using occluder devices, suture loops or excision procedures have emanated as alternatives to prevent and revert the thrombosis process. However, LAA removal or ligation techniques, such as surgical excision and internal suture obliteration, require cardiac arrest, and the use of epicardial clip occlusion or stapled excision can pose challenges related to device navigation and the risk of procedure-related tears along the staple line [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, left atrial appendage closure using occluder devices, suture loops or excision procedures have emanated as alternatives to prevent and revert the thrombosis process. However, LAA removal or ligation techniques, such as surgical excision and internal suture obliteration, require cardiac arrest, and the use of epicardial clip occlusion or stapled excision can pose challenges related to device navigation and the risk of procedure-related tears along the staple line [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, patients should have a high risk of bleeding (e.g., high HAS‐BLED score ≥3) or oral anticoagulant(OAC) intolerance(including previous bleeding, risk of falls, uncontrolled hypertension, kidney or liver failure, alcohol intake, concurrent use of antiplatelet or non steroidal drugs, high‐risk occupations, poor compliance, unstable international standardized ratios, OAC allergies, and drug interactions, among other factors) 4 . Research has shown that LAAC surgery is associated with a reduced incidence of cardiovascular events during hospitalization, and can also improve patient prognosis in long‐term follow‐up 5,6 . In the past 20 years, among non‐valvular atrial fibrillation patients with increased risk of stroke, LAAC has become a safe and effective alternative to oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 Research has shown that LAAC surgery is associated with a reduced incidence of cardiovascular events during hospitalization, and can also improve patient prognosis in long‐term follow‐up. 5 , 6 In the past 20 years, among non‐valvular atrial fibrillation patients with increased risk of stroke, LAAC has become a safe and effective alternative to oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. 7 However, the drawbacks of left atrial appendage occlusion cannot be ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke, requiring anticoagulation. Despite progress and development in anticoagulation strategies, the high risk of bleeding complications and strict medication adherence make treatment more complex.In the past few decades, left atrial appendage has become a promising therapeutic target,which can prevent thromboembolic events while reducing the problem of bleeding complications (2,3).Research has shown that left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) surgery is associated with a reduced incidence of cardiovascular events during hospitalization, and can also improve patient prognosis in long-term followup (4,5). In the past 20 years, among non valvular atrial fibrillation patients with increased risk of stroke, LAAO has become a safe and effective alternative to oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%