2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency between self-reported alcohol consumption and biological markers among patients with alcohol use disorder – A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the NZHS gathers information directly from individual users of AoD whereas the current study used secondary sources (family/whānau members and close friends of users). Under-reporting of alcohol consumption is common in self-reported population surveys [ 28 , 29 ]. Individual users may under-report use due to fear of stigmatisation, and family members may under-disclose AoD use by their loved ones in one-on-one interviews due to concealed stigma [ 30 ], which is associated with chronic sorrow among family members and close friends of people using AoD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the NZHS gathers information directly from individual users of AoD whereas the current study used secondary sources (family/whānau members and close friends of users). Under-reporting of alcohol consumption is common in self-reported population surveys [ 28 , 29 ]. Individual users may under-report use due to fear of stigmatisation, and family members may under-disclose AoD use by their loved ones in one-on-one interviews due to concealed stigma [ 30 ], which is associated with chronic sorrow among family members and close friends of people using AoD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSO assessment of co-parent (or other relation) PAC is a method used in all previous CRAFT-trials since the drinking relative is never the study participant. Research shows that collateral informants show satisfactory correspondence when comparing self-reports and reports from others, especially partners [ 45 47 ].…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, data for the study were collected through self-reported questionnaires and therefore vulnerable to recall bias and error by participants. The uncertainty surrounding self-reported alcohol intake is a constant challenge in research, since some participants may purposefully under-represent their intake [ 30 , 31 ]. Moreover, the networks of newer immigrants likely had family members: such familial association for drinking habits/AUD could partially explain why there was no difference between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%