2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2004.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency degrees of theories in some systems of propositional fuzzy logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory of truth degree in [20,25] has been applied to studying of fuzzy reasoning and semantic properties like consistency, satisfiability, etc., and some interesting results have been acquired [25][26][27][28][29][30]. In this paper, the Σ Γ -truth degree is proposed which is an expanded version of the truth degree, and Γ -pseudo-metric is introduced in the system L * n .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of truth degree in [20,25] has been applied to studying of fuzzy reasoning and semantic properties like consistency, satisfiability, etc., and some interesting results have been acquired [25][26][27][28][29][30]. In this paper, the Σ Γ -truth degree is proposed which is an expanded version of the truth degree, and Γ -pseudo-metric is introduced in the system L * n .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires a unified definition of ¬x, i.e., ¬x = R(x, 0) should be accepted in the above-mentioned logic systems. One may think that this would cause mistakes when we use the concepts of truth degrees and resemblance degrees of formulas and pseudo-metric on F (S) of [21,16] in the present paper. Fortunately, the differences mentioned above are not essential for us to use these concepts of [21,16], i.e., such concepts in [21,16] also hold when ¬x = R(x, 0) is defined instead for R ∈ {R G , R }.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The careful reader may find that the definition of unary operator ¬ differs from the one given in [21,16] when R ∈ {R G , R }, but is identical with the one given in [4]. In [21,16] …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations