2019
DOI: 10.15694/mep.2019.000113.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agency

Abstract: Credibility of an education program accreditor is dependent on consistency in decision-making among program reviews. The use of peer-review accreditation survey teams is a potential source of inconsistency in the review of individual programs, especially so when the agency employs non-prescriptive accreditation standards. The accrediting agency that is the subject of this study utilized multiple steps to ensure consistency in the recommendations from peer survey teams. Analysis of the agreement between survey … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?