2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27947-9_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consonant-to-Vowel/Vowel-to-Consonant Transitions to Analyze the Speech of Cochlear Implant Users

Abstract: People with postlingual onset of deafness often present speech production problems even after hearing rehabilitation by cochlear implantation. In this paper, the speech of 20 postlingual (aged between 33 and 78 years old) and 20 healthy control (aged between 31 and 62 years old) German native speakers is analyzed considering acoustic features extracted from Consonant-to-Vowel (CV) and Vowel-to-Consonant (VC) transitions. The transitions are analyzed with reference to the manner of articulation of consonants ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance to the duration features, the rhythm features PVI-Voc/Con and Std-Voc/Con are higher for male and female CI users compared with the control speakers. As for the precision of changes from voiced to unvoiced and vice versa, a previous analysis of the transitions also showed marked differences between CI and controls (Arias-Vergara et al, 2019). This may reflect the reduced auditory feedback and inconsistently increased effort to control speech.…”
Section: Rhythm Featuresmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In accordance to the duration features, the rhythm features PVI-Voc/Con and Std-Voc/Con are higher for male and female CI users compared with the control speakers. As for the precision of changes from voiced to unvoiced and vice versa, a previous analysis of the transitions also showed marked differences between CI and controls (Arias-Vergara et al, 2019). This may reflect the reduced auditory feedback and inconsistently increased effort to control speech.…”
Section: Rhythm Featuresmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…People suffering from severe to profound deafness may experience different speech disorders such as decreased intelligibility and changes in terms of articulation [25]. Acoustic analysis is performed in order to detect articulatory problems in the speech of CI users by detecting the voiceless-to-voiced (Onset) and voiced-to-voiceless (Offset) transitions, which are considered to model the difficulties of the CI users to start/stop the movement of the vocal folds [26,27]. The method used to identify the transitions is based on the presence of the fundamental frequency of speech (pitch) in short-time frames as it was shown in [28].…”
Section: Automatic Detection Of Disordered Speech In CI Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2] speech intelligibility of 50 CI users is evaluated using an automatic speech recognition system and compared with 50 Healthy Controls (HC). Recently in [3] automatic classification using Support Vector Machines (SVM) between 20 CI users and 20 healthy speakers was performed in order to evaluate articulation disorders considering acoustic features. For the case of pathological speech detection, CNNs have outperformed classical machine learning methods [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%