2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4485(00)00077-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint-based functional design verification for conceptual design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A functional structure can be validated by considering both logical and physical dependencies and confirming matching inputs and outputs among sub-functions [65]. Several flow analysis methods such as bond graph and Petri nets [66] and modularity methods such as function structure heuristic method [67], design structure matrix [68] and modular function deployment [69] are applicable to the verification and validation of functional structures.…”
Section: Functional Decomposition and Flow Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A functional structure can be validated by considering both logical and physical dependencies and confirming matching inputs and outputs among sub-functions [65]. Several flow analysis methods such as bond graph and Petri nets [66] and modularity methods such as function structure heuristic method [67], design structure matrix [68] and modular function deployment [69] are applicable to the verification and validation of functional structures.…”
Section: Functional Decomposition and Flow Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UML attends to this and allows purpose-oriented views, favouring communication between designer, project manager, process planner, client, etc. UML is consistent with state-of-the-art concepts like functional design [12,13] and end-of-life disposal [14][15][16]. UML is an information-rich representation; models can be tested for consistency, analysed, or translated into other representations (Gantt charts, bills-of-material, and so on; see Section 2.5).…”
Section: Why Uml Is a Good Plm Modelling Languagementioning
confidence: 92%
“…These variables include the required system performances and/or other evaluation criteria, and the relevant system loadings and attributes, where the attributes include both the structural attributes and the material properties. This is achieved by first modeling the behavior of the system and those of the materials used, into a behavioral process [19]. This is the combination of a number of individual behaviors, constructed by connecting the outputs of a preceding behavior with the inputs of a succeeding behavior.…”
Section: Materials Selection At the Downstream Design Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%