2010
DOI: 10.1109/tcapt.2010.2052051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constriction Resistance of Thin Film Contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we used a partially idealized model which excludes the surface roughness and the results show some uncertainties due to numerical errors. Research in [19], on the influence of the thin film on the contact resistance, was based on one contact spot and is also limited by some restriction in the film thickness and the contact area sizes. None of the above contact resistance models can be used to analyze the evolution of the resistance obtained in this paper.…”
Section: A Contact Resistance Versus Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we used a partially idealized model which excludes the surface roughness and the results show some uncertainties due to numerical errors. Research in [19], on the influence of the thin film on the contact resistance, was based on one contact spot and is also limited by some restriction in the film thickness and the contact area sizes. None of the above contact resistance models can be used to analyze the evolution of the resistance obtained in this paper.…”
Section: A Contact Resistance Versus Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DC resistance of geometries similar to Fig. 1 was previously studied analytically by Zhang et al 21 From this work, the expected theoretical spreading resistance may be derived as R spread,theo =R C 2πwσ [20] where R C is a function of the relative conductivities of the electrode and electrolyte as well as the geometric parameters. The analytical expression for R C is unwieldy, but in the limit of R ode / R yte → ∞ it may be simplified 21 as…”
Section: 232943mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Several methods have been used to determine the effect of the ratio between contact radius a and film thickness L on contact resistance between flat thin films at different ranges. A mathematical model theorizes that thin film geometry causes the spreading resistance to be constrained to a much smaller region than the region where the spreading resistance takes place in non-thin films resulting in a lower contact resistance than that predicted by Holm and that contact resistance decreases with decreasing film thickness [1]. These results were valid only for values of a/L less than 0.5 [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%