Construct and criterion validity of the functional gait assessment—Brazil in community-dwelling older adults

Marques, Leonardo; Moreira, Bruno de Souza; Ocarino, Juliana M.; Sampaio, Rosana Ferreira; Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho; Kirkwood, Renata Noce

doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.05.008

Cited by 16 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In reliability analysis, the Cronbach's α coefficient and the split-half reliability coefficient of the scale were both above the reference value [36] but slightly lower than the original version and the Spanish version [19,20], which indicated the scale has an optimal internal consistency. Moreover, the previously labeled nurses were remeasured two weeks later, and the test-retest reliability coefficient reached an acceptable range [36], indicating that the scale has measurement stability across time [38].…”

Section: The Scientificity Of the Scalementioning

confidence: 85%

“…After two weeks, the scale was adopted to remeasure the previously labeled 80 clinical nurses, and the correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the stability of the scale across time. We require that the Cronbach'α coefficient, the split-half reliability coefficient and test-retest reliability coefficient should all be 0.7 or above [36,37].…”

Section: The Psychometric Evaluation Of the Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses

Yang

Wang

2022

BMC Palliat Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Nurses are one of the most critical members of advance care planning (ACP) discussion. The evaluation of ACP self-efficacy is of great significance for developing targeted ACP interventions among clinical nurses and update their professional roles. However, there are few instruments to evaluate their ACP self-efficacy in mainland China. The purpose of this study was to translate the ACP self-efficacy scale into Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties among clinical nurses. Methods A methodological study of the translation and validation of the ACP self-efficacy scale was conducted from January to March 2022. It involved three phases: (1) the translation and revision of the scale; (2) the exploration and evaluation of the item (n = 436); (3) the psychometric evaluation of the scale (n = 674). Results After a rigorous translation and revision, the ACP self-efficacy scale with three dimensions and 16 items was finally formed. In this study, the critical ratios of the item ranged from 8.226 to 17.499, and the item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.437 to 0.732, and the factor loadings of the item ranged from 0.638 to 0.882. The content validity index of the scale was 0.946. Supported by the eigenvalues, the three-factor structure explained the cumulative 61.131% of the overall variance. As the results of confirmatory factor analysis, all the recommended fitting indexes were appropriate. The average variance extracted values ranged from 0.570 to 0.756, and the composite reliability values ranged from 0.858 to 0.925. The total Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half reliability coefficient and test–retest reliability coefficient of the scale were 0.896, 0.767 and 0.939, respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of ACP self-efficacy scale was successfully introduced into China, showing good psychometric properties among clinical nurses, and can effectively assess the ACP self-efficacy. Also, the scale can provide nursing educators with a significant strategy to develop ACP educational procedure and post-intervention measures for clinical nurses to improve nurse-led ACP practice.

show abstract

Section: The Scientificity Of the Scalementioning

confidence: 85%

Section: The Psychometric Evaluation Of the Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses

Yang

Wang

2022

BMC Palliat Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In reliability analysis, the Cronbach’s α coefficient for the total questionnaire was 0.930, and the Cronbach’s α coefficients for the factors ranged from 0.709 to 0.898. It showed that items within five dimensions generally were associated with each other, and the questionnaire has good internal consistency [ 34 ]. The total split-half reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.952, with good homogeneity and intrinsic correlation between items [ 34 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It showed that items within five dimensions generally were associated with each other, and the questionnaire has good internal consistency [ 34 ]. The total split-half reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.952, with good homogeneity and intrinsic correlation between items [ 34 ]. The total test–retest reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.768, indicating an appropriate stability of the questionnaire [ 34 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development and psychometric evaluation of a new patient -reported outcome measure for psoriasis self-management efficacy: the self-management efficacy questionnaire among patients with psoriasis (SMEQ-PSO)

Sun

Zhang

Yang

et al. 2023

Health Qual Life Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background It is significant for the healthy outcome of patients with psoriasis (PSO) to improve their self-management efficacy. A standardized assessment tool, however, was lacking. Therefore, we aimed to develop a self-management efficacy questionnaire for patients with PSO (SMEQ-PSO) and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods A cross-sectional study developing clinical evaluation tool was conducted from October 2021 to August 2022. In the process of developing SMEQ-PSO, three phases were involved: item generation, item evaluation, and psychometric evaluation. Results The SMEQ-PSO with five dimensions and 28 items was developed. The questionnaire’s content validity index was 0.976. Exploratory factor analysis indicated a five-factor structure (self-efficacy of psychosocial adaptation, self-efficacy of daily life management, self-efficacy of skin management, self-efficacy of disease knowledge management and self-efficacy of disease treatment management) that explained 62.039% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated appropriate fit of the five-factor model. The overall Cronbach’α coefficient was 0.930, the test-retest reliability was 0.768 and the split half reliability coefficients was 0.952. Conclusions The 28-item SMEQ-PSO is a reliable and valid tool that can be used to assess the self-management efficacy among patients with PSO and provide personalized interventions based on their individual circumstances to improve their health outcomes.

show abstract

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire for nurses

Xie,

Li,

Liu

et al. 2024

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimNurses play a crucial role within medical institutions, maintaining direct interaction with patient data. Despite this, there is a scarcity of tools for evaluating nurses' perspectives on patient information security. This study aimed to translate the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire into Chinese and validate its reliability and validity among clinical nurses.DesignA cross‐sectional design.MethodsA total of 728 clinical nurses from three hospitals in China participated in this study. The Information Security Attitude Questionnaire (ISA‐Q) was translated into Chinese utilizing the Brislin two‐way translation method. The reliability was assessed through internal consistency coefficient and test–retest reliability. The validity was determined through the Delphi expert consultation method and factor analysis.ResultsThe Chinese version of ISA‐Q consists of 30 items. Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.930, and Cronbach's α coefficient of the six dimensions ranged from 0.781 to 0.938. The split‐half reliability and test–retest reliability were 0.797 and 0.848, respectively. The content validity index (S‐CVI) was 0.962. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 6‐factor structure supported by eigenvalues, total variance interpretation, and scree plots, accounting for a cumulative variance contribution rate of 69.436%. Confirmatory factor analysis further validated the 6‐factor structure, demonstrating an appropriate model fit.ConclusionThe robust reliability and validity exhibited by the Chinese version of ISA‐Q establish it as a dependable tool for evaluating the information security attitudes of clinical nurses.Implications for Nursing PracticeThe Chinese iteration of the ISA‐Q questionnaire offers a profound insight into the information security attitudes held by clinical nurses. This understanding serves as a foundation for nursing managers to develop targeted intervention strategies aimed at fortifying nurses' information security attitudes, thereby enhancing patient safety.

show abstract

Construct and criterion validity of the functional gait assessment—Brazil in community-dwelling older adults

Cited by 16 publications

References 22 publications

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses

Development and psychometric evaluation of a new patient -reported outcome measure for psoriasis self-management efficacy: the self-management efficacy questionnaire among patients with psoriasis (SMEQ-PSO)

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire for nurses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About