1999
DOI: 10.1076/clin.13.1.54.1977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct Validity of the Continuous Recognition Memory Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the distributions of HITs and FAs had separate relationships to TC and RT, there is no probabilistic relationship between them, and accordingly, Signal Detection Theory does not appear to apply to the analysis of the MemTrax CRT. This finding is consistent with similar studies of CRTs ( Fuchs et al, 1999 ). In a CRT, the HITs represent a complex recognition event, not just the distinguishing of a signal from a noise, and the FAs represent the tendency to lack inhibition in the complex decision to respond or not respond.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…However, since the distributions of HITs and FAs had separate relationships to TC and RT, there is no probabilistic relationship between them, and accordingly, Signal Detection Theory does not appear to apply to the analysis of the MemTrax CRT. This finding is consistent with similar studies of CRTs ( Fuchs et al, 1999 ). In a CRT, the HITs represent a complex recognition event, not just the distinguishing of a signal from a noise, and the FAs represent the tendency to lack inhibition in the complex decision to respond or not respond.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Similar tests administered in-person, the Continuous Visual Memory Test ( Larrabee et al, 1992 ) and the Continuous Recognition Memory test ( Fuchs et al, 1999 ), have already been shown to have construct validity. Of note, the Continuous Recognition Memory test shows the same dissociation of HITs and Correct Rejections shown for these MemTrax data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study analyzed the distribution of behavioral data produced when individuals performed an online modification of a traditional Signal Detection Task (SDT), the MemTrax CRT ( Ashford et al, 2019b ), to test learning, memory, and cognition. Prior in-person, not-computerized CRTs, the Continuous Visual Memory Test ( Larrabee et al, 1992 ) and the Continuous Recognition Memory test ( Fuchs et al, 1999 ), have used a similar format with different types of stimuli and have shown that the CRT format has construct validity. Related studies have examined the retrieval processes involved in continuous recognition ( Hockley, 1982 ) and provided information on memory trace strength and the memory theories ( Hockley, 1984b , 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within-day reliability of the 2-back was low from this preliminary study, so 2-back task rules were adjusted prior to conducting the current study such that participants were required to respond to non-match items (rather than solely match items). Literature suggests the memory recognition paradigm and flanker task are valid and reliable measures of memory and attention, respectively (Fuchs et al, 1999; Zelazo et al, 2014). While there are mixed findings regarding the validity of the 2-back as a measure of working memory, it is reliable (Jacola et al, 2014) and helpful in identifying differences in cognitive processing between groups/clinical populations (Miller et al, 2009), and following acute exercise (Basso and Suzuki, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%