2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of a SNP-based genetic linkage map in cultivated peanut based on large scale marker development using next-generation double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq)

Abstract: BackgroundCultivated peanut, or groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), is an important oilseed crop with an allotetraploid genome (AABB, 2n = 4x = 40). In recent years, many efforts have been made to construct linkage maps in cultivated peanut, but almost all of these maps were constructed using low-throughput molecular markers, and most show a low density, directly influencing the value of their applications. With advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, the construction of high-density genetic maps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
136
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
136
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The double‐digest RADseq (ddRADseq; Peterson, Weber, Kay, Fisher, & Hoekstra, 2012), a variation of the original method (Baird et al., 2008), improves on depth of coverage per locus by optimizing sequencing effort and reducing missing genotypes. The protocol is flexible, allowing for easy optimization for different organisms, genome sizes, genetic diversity, and scientific questions (Mastretta‐Yanes et al., 2015; Nieto‐Montes de Oca et al., 2017; Recknagel, Elmer, & Meyer, 2013; Zhou et al., 2014). Consequently, numerous modifications or improvements of ddRADseq are being continually proposed (Franchini, Parera, Kautt, & Meyer, 2017; Heffelfinger et al., 2014; Recknagel, Jacobs, Herzyk, & Elmer, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double‐digest RADseq (ddRADseq; Peterson, Weber, Kay, Fisher, & Hoekstra, 2012), a variation of the original method (Baird et al., 2008), improves on depth of coverage per locus by optimizing sequencing effort and reducing missing genotypes. The protocol is flexible, allowing for easy optimization for different organisms, genome sizes, genetic diversity, and scientific questions (Mastretta‐Yanes et al., 2015; Nieto‐Montes de Oca et al., 2017; Recknagel, Elmer, & Meyer, 2013; Zhou et al., 2014). Consequently, numerous modifications or improvements of ddRADseq are being continually proposed (Franchini, Parera, Kautt, & Meyer, 2017; Heffelfinger et al., 2014; Recknagel, Jacobs, Herzyk, & Elmer, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher percentages indicate less Figure 7 Identification of genetic exchange between subgenomes in cultivated peanut. The top graph depicts the result of recombination between A04 and B04 in RIL028, and, for comparison, the bottom graph shows RIL025, a typical line where this type of recombination has not occurred (lines described in Zhou et al 41 ). The y axis shows log 2 -transformed ratios of densities of mapping for restriction site-associated sequence reads along the diploid chromosomal pseudomolecules divided by the mapping densities of a parental line.…”
Section: Diploid Genome-guided Tetraploid Transcriptome Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the chromosomal pseudomolecules to investigate the frequency of recombination between A and B subgenomes in 166 cultivated peanut RILs described in a previous study 41 . To do this, we calculated the mapping densities of restriction site-associated sequence reads from these RILs and their parental lines along the chromosomal pseudomolecules.…”
Section: Sequence Comparisons To Tetraploid Cultivated Peanutmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations