Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2006 2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74496-2_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Low-Discrepancy Point Sets of Small Size by Bracketing Covers and Dependent Randomized Rounding

Abstract: In memory of our friend, colleague and former fellow student Manfred Schocker Summary. We provide a deterministic algorithm that constructs small point sets exhibiting a low star discrepancy. The algorithm is based on bracketing and on recent results on randomized roundings respecting hard constraints. It is structurally much simpler than the previous algorithm presented for this problem in [B. Doerr, M. Gnewuch, A. Srivastav. Bounds and constructions for the star discrepancy via δ-covers. J. Complexity, 21:69… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This establishes (2). Let us identify the functions 1 [0,x) in C d with the corresponding points x ∈ [0, 1] d and the functions 1 [x,y) …”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This establishes (2). Let us identify the functions 1 [0,x) in C d with the corresponding points x ∈ [0, 1] d and the functions 1 [x,y) …”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This bound is obviously weaker than the bounds in (1.1) and (1.2), but the run-time of our derandomized algorithm improves considerably on the run-times of the algorithms in [4,5] generating point sets satisfying (1.2). In Section 5 we compare the run-times of the algorithms to each other and relate the problem of constructing low-discrepancy samples of small size to the problem of approximating the star discrepancy of a given point set.…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the light of these results it is not too surprising that the run-times of the derandomized algorithms in this paper and in [4,5] are exponentially in s, since we cannot expect to do the (deterministic) derandomized construction with less effort than the (probabilistic) semi-construction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations