2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0399-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer resistance to innovation—a behavioral reasoning perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
367
2
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(463 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
26
367
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying TRA in the context of technology adoption behavior, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) provides theoretical links between two factors that measure individuals' perceptions-specifically, Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEU)-and their effects on those individuals' attitudes and intention to use new technology. TAM is grounded in the assumption that the way consumers evaluate the attributes of an innovation is ultimately related to their decision to adopt the innovation (Claudy et al 2015). However, researchers are increasingly concerned about the TAM model because of its incomplete and parsimonious measures as well as the measures' lack of adaptability outside an organizational context (Bouwman et al 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Applying TRA in the context of technology adoption behavior, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) provides theoretical links between two factors that measure individuals' perceptions-specifically, Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEU)-and their effects on those individuals' attitudes and intention to use new technology. TAM is grounded in the assumption that the way consumers evaluate the attributes of an innovation is ultimately related to their decision to adopt the innovation (Claudy et al 2015). However, researchers are increasingly concerned about the TAM model because of its incomplete and parsimonious measures as well as the measures' lack of adaptability outside an organizational context (Bouwman et al 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research on technology adoption shows that people's motives to adopt innovation may differ, but their motivations influence their decisions (Claudy et al 2015). In general, attitudes represent individuals' motives, which influence behavioral outcomes.…”
Section: The Effects Of Attitude On Intention To Use 3d Printed Fashimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent innovation diffusion studies in the marketing field (e.g., Claudy et al 2015;Laukkanen 2016;Patsiotis, Hughes and Webber 2013) suggest that a small number of research models dominate (e.g., Theory of Reasoned Action [TRA]; Technology Acceptance Model [TAM]). However, there is no clear consensus on the most relevant factors impacting diffusion or the best way of determining how these might be defined.…”
Section: Discussion and Key Theoretical Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these can be readily articulated via the previously noted composites of value and remain key to understanding. However, we note a recent strand of TRA-related research (e.g., Claudy et al 2015) where, based on Westaby's (2005) Behavioral Reasoning Theory (BRT), both Breasons for^and Breasons against^are given as key antecedents to innovation diffusion. We are convinced by their suggestion that Breasons^play a role in the wrangling process (they have causal efficacy) and that both continuance and defection will result partly from consciously/sub-consciously rehearsed arguments.…”
Section: The Nature Of Trade-offsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the enhanced product is known as a category representative, the number of features or advantages it holds over older products are unclear. The prices of innovative products are higher compared to traditional ones, which, combined with obscure value criteria, makes the purchase decision risky and requiring more thinking through (Claudy, Garcia & O'Driscoll, 2015). Unless the innovation is highly supreme over older alternatives, it might face individual adoption and diff usion barriers due to complexity, established confronting norms and behavioral patterns in the fi eld, low observability, and trialability (Rogers, 2003), or consumers' fear of losing their autonomy or control over technologies (Heiskanen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Purchase Decisions On Traditional and Innovative Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%