2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact and coherence: Dialectal leveling and structural convergence in NYC Spanish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A less common but increasingly frequent method for describing /s/ variation relies on measurements of the acoustic properties of fricative moments, leaving aside the question of segmental categories (Minnick Fox 2006, Erker 2010, File-Muriel and Brown 2011. Despite this methodological variability in the description of /s/ weakening, the research literature converges in demonstrating that it is systematically constrained by a range of linguistic factors, 5 including preceding and following segments (Ma and Hirashimchuk 1975, Alba 2000, File Muriel 2007, Lynch 2009), word-position and speech rate (Hammond 1980), prosodic context (Poplack 1981, Alfaraz 2000, Brown and Cacoullos 2003, lexical frequency (Bybee et al 2016, Erker andOtheguy 2016), and morphemic status and other functional considerations (Terrell 1975a1979, Poplack 1980b, Uber 1981, 1989, Hochberg 1986, Hundley 1987, Ranson 1992, Cameron 1996.…”
Section: Coda /S/mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A less common but increasingly frequent method for describing /s/ variation relies on measurements of the acoustic properties of fricative moments, leaving aside the question of segmental categories (Minnick Fox 2006, Erker 2010, File-Muriel and Brown 2011. Despite this methodological variability in the description of /s/ weakening, the research literature converges in demonstrating that it is systematically constrained by a range of linguistic factors, 5 including preceding and following segments (Ma and Hirashimchuk 1975, Alba 2000, File Muriel 2007, Lynch 2009), word-position and speech rate (Hammond 1980), prosodic context (Poplack 1981, Alfaraz 2000, Brown and Cacoullos 2003, lexical frequency (Bybee et al 2016, Erker andOtheguy 2016), and morphemic status and other functional considerations (Terrell 1975a1979, Poplack 1980b, Uber 1981, 1989, Hochberg 1986, Hundley 1987, Ranson 1992, Cameron 1996.…”
Section: Coda /S/mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third development is the extension of sociolinguistic inquiry to languages and areas of the world that have previously been under‐explored. The emphasis on research in largely monolingual European or North American contexts is giving way to a broader view including multilingual contexts (Erker & Otheguy, ), sign languages (Stamp, Schembri, Evans, & Cormier, ), endangered languages (Hildebrandt, Jany, & Silva ), and a focus on geographical areas in other parts of the world (Bayley et al., ; Stanford & Preston, ). As a result, sociolinguists are taking into account a much wider range of linguistic and cultural diversity.…”
Section: Sociolinguistics and Language Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Otheguy-Zentella Corpus of Spanish in New York (OZC), Otheguy and Zentella (2012) and Erker and Otheguy (2016) have both demonstrated that time spent in the U.S. not only correlates with higher overt pronoun usage in Spanish speakers, but also with a decrease in the capacity of speakers' regional heritage to predict their rates of overt pronoun usage. In these studies, speakers are grouped according to whether they have regional heritage in mainland Latin America or in the Caribbean: the mean pronoun usage rate of Caribbean speakers in the OZC (specified as those of Cuban, Dominican Republic or Puerto Rican descent) is 39.4%, with a standard deviation of 10.1%, and the mean for Mainlanders (those of Colombian, Ecuadorian or Mexican descent) is 27.6%, with a standard deviation of 9.8%.…”
Section: Spp Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Whereas longtime-resident speakers have lived in the country at least six years, newcomer speakers arrived less than six years ago and after their 17th birthday. (Erker & Otheguy, 2016) Erker and Otheguy (2016) propose that one possible reason for this observed attenuation of regional difference is that the linguistic systems of Spanish and English are converging in the minds of Spanish-English bilingual speakers, leading to a broader phenomenon known as passive dialectal leveling. 4 The researchers define such linguistic convergence between Spanish and English as "the enhancement of inherent structural similarities found between two linguistic systems" (Bullock & Toribio, 2004, p. 91, as cited in Erker & Otheguy 2016, and define the resulting passive dialectal leveling as the attenuation of regional differences in linguistic behavior (Erker & Otheguy, 2016, p. 132).…”
Section: Spp Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation