2007
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2006.886271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content-Based Retrieval of 3-D Objects Using Spin Image Signatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Fig. 9a it is also worth noting that the performance of the proposed approach when using shape information only is rather similar to that of [17], consistently with the fact that both methods are based on the same type of descriptor. Instead the performance of the proposed method is clearly better than that of [17] when both shape and color information are combined together.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From Fig. 9a it is also worth noting that the performance of the proposed approach when using shape information only is rather similar to that of [17], consistently with the fact that both methods are based on the same type of descriptor. Instead the performance of the proposed method is clearly better than that of [17] when both shape and color information are combined together.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…9a it is also worth noting that the performance of the proposed approach when using shape information only is rather similar to that of [17], consistently with the fact that both methods are based on the same type of descriptor. Instead the performance of the proposed method is clearly better than that of [17] when both shape and color information are combined together. The performance difference between the two methods is a good indication of the improvement color information may bring to 3D retrieval (the method of [17] exploits shape data only as most methods in the literature).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations