IP Over WDM 2003
DOI: 10.1002/0471478342.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contention Resolution in Optical Packet Switching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5(a). The total blocking probability can be seen in this figure with a purple continuous line without markers, calculated by using (8). This figure shows that the major contribution for blocking probability is due to OCS, followed by OBS and OPS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…5(a). The total blocking probability can be seen in this figure with a purple continuous line without markers, calculated by using (8). This figure shows that the major contribution for blocking probability is due to OCS, followed by OBS and OPS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This situation may arise if the contention is persistent. The WU also contains a set of full range wavelength converters used for ODL buffers conflicts resolution [20]. The implementation of the virtual optical memory will be discussed in a following section.…”
Section: The Waiting Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It opens the optical burst gate (OBG) or the optical packet gate (OPG), depending on the incoming unit type. Today, the lack of fast, scalable, and robust optical bit-level processing technologies has led to the implementation of the major functions of the SCU at the electronic level [12].…”
Section: Switch Node Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%