2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2015.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context Weaver: Awareness and feedback in networked mobile crowdsourcing tools

Abstract: Mobile crowdsourcing allows people to collect data using a large pool of participants. In this paper, we focus on mobile crowdsourcing for citizens to solve local issues in context. We argue that such crowdsourcing environments need to support exploration, a continuous, opportunistic, and multi-perspective process that existing crowd sensing systems cannot easily support. We have developed a system called Context Weaver, which connect participants using networked mobile devices in order to support collaborativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DT strongly influence employee behavior in the scope of, among other things, creativity and employee well-being (Van Knippenberg et al, 2015), collaborative practices and the need for sensory and emotional engagement in the workplace (Gruber et al, 2015). It makes professional work much easier, facilitating the communication process, allowing new possibilities of virtual teamwork (Gilson et al, 2014), providing some new ideas and tools (e.g., networked mobile crowdsourcing tools; Sasao et al, 2015). However, there are of course some disadvantages.…”
Section: The Digital Work Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DT strongly influence employee behavior in the scope of, among other things, creativity and employee well-being (Van Knippenberg et al, 2015), collaborative practices and the need for sensory and emotional engagement in the workplace (Gruber et al, 2015). It makes professional work much easier, facilitating the communication process, allowing new possibilities of virtual teamwork (Gilson et al, 2014), providing some new ideas and tools (e.g., networked mobile crowdsourcing tools; Sasao et al, 2015). However, there are of course some disadvantages.…”
Section: The Digital Work Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies develop the taxonomy of gig work based on task complexity as well as different forms of crowdsourcing (e.g., contractual, distributed problem-solving, solo, and reciprocal coordination) that fit different kinds of tasks (Nakatsu, Grossman, & Iacovou, 2014). Moreover, studies have investigated certain practices, such as networked mobile crowdsourcing tools (Sasao, Konomi, Arikawa, & Fujita, 2015) and resource allocation and task division (Dissanayake, Zhang, & Gu, 2015) for task-and attitude-related benefits. Nonetheless, despite its importance in regards to how we might better advance our understanding for the future of work, HR research on this new form of labor relationship is scant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through mobile crowdsourcing techniques, opportunities for citizen participation are created and a pool of participants around the city can engage in tasks and generate data in a distributed manner. Ubiquitous devices such as tablets and smartphones allow people to take pictures, to answer questions, to vote, to draw everywhere, and facilitate to register facts and ideas [54]. A GWAP is another strategy that may be used to extract information from a human player, which should be fun while performing tasks that are difficult to computers [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second stage, through a survey, the task type would be “answer specific question”. According to the RQ1, the task type “enter information into a map” is used mainly in VGI platforms [56] and mobile crowdsourcing [54,57], but the former can add not only locations, but also other spatial information such as mobility and the associated contexts [58]. The task type “answer specific question” is mainly used in participatory sensing approaches [59,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%