2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619265114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continual renewal and replication of persistentLeishmania majorparasites in concomitantly immune hosts

Abstract: In most natural infections or after recovery, small numbers of Leishmania parasites remain indefinitely in the host. Persistent parasites play a vital role in protective immunity against disease pathology upon reinfection through the process of concomitant immunity, as well as in transmission and reactivation, yet are poorly understood. A key question is whether persistent parasites undergo replication, and we devised several approaches to probe the small numbers in persistent infections. We find two populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
114
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
6
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches have been established to determine pathogen proliferation in vivo. For Leishmania spp., heavy water labeling [57] and in vivo BrdU labeling [63] have been used to identify proliferating parasites by dilution of deuterium isotopes or by DNA synthesis, respectively. However, these approaches had only limited compatibility with single-cell analysis and antibody staining and did not permit in vivo validation of the readout through side-by-side comparison with the actual cell division events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been established to determine pathogen proliferation in vivo. For Leishmania spp., heavy water labeling [57] and in vivo BrdU labeling [63] have been used to identify proliferating parasites by dilution of deuterium isotopes or by DNA synthesis, respectively. However, these approaches had only limited compatibility with single-cell analysis and antibody staining and did not permit in vivo validation of the readout through side-by-side comparison with the actual cell division events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrophages are one of the primary cell types that exert microbicidal activity against several groups microorganisms via polarization and duality of the response between the M1 and M2 phenotypes. [144][145][146] Therefore, an intriguing relationship is established in infectious diseases due to what happens intracellularly. [144][145][146] Classically, iNOS and Arg1 are characteristic and determinant markers for modulating the response of either M1 (iNOS) or M2 (Arg1) macrophages.…”
Section: Markers Of M1 M2 and M4 Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[144][145][146] Therefore, an intriguing relationship is established in infectious diseases due to what happens intracellularly. [144][145][146] Classically, iNOS and Arg1 are characteristic and determinant markers for modulating the response of either M1 (iNOS) or M2 (Arg1) macrophages. [147][148][149] The resulting effects of these enzymes demonstrate that both compete for the same substrate (arginine) in order to induce the production of NO (M1) or proliamines and proline (M2).…”
Section: Markers Of M1 M2 and M4 Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future experiments should thus reveal the mechanisms of persistent haemoplasma infection. In particular, it is important to understand whether (a) the low stable infection levels result from the bacterium's or the mammalian host's actions, (b) the bacterium hides in other tissues in the rodent's body (Novacco, Riond, Meli, Grest, & Hofmann-Lehmann, 2013;Tasker et al, 2009a;Wolf-Jäckel et al, 2012), and (c) the bacterium replicates during the stabilized infection period or remains in a dormant state (Mandell & Beverley, 2017;Monack & Hultgren, 2013;Potgieter, Bester, Kell, & Pretorius, 2015;Vadivelu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Infection Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%