1999
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199905000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Cardiac Output in Septic Shock by Simulating a Model of the Aortic Input Impedance 

Abstract: In mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock, changes in bolus TDCO are reflected by calibrated MCO over a range of cardiac output values. A single calibration of the model appears sufficient to monitor continuous cardiac output over a 2-day period with a bias of -0.1 +/- 0.8 l/min.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
155
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ModelFlow method assumes a population average of aortic area depending on sex, age, height and mass. Several studies have validated the ModelFlow method compared with the standard invasive techniques (thermodilution and pulse dye densitometry) and indicate that this method provides a reliable estimate of changes in cardiac output in healthy exercising humans (Matsukawa et al 2004), patients with septic shock (Jellema et al 1999) or during prolonged tilt testing (Harms et al 1999). However, the validity of absolute ModelFlow estimates are uncertain during initial changes in posture or with ageing (Remmen et al 2002).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ModelFlow method assumes a population average of aortic area depending on sex, age, height and mass. Several studies have validated the ModelFlow method compared with the standard invasive techniques (thermodilution and pulse dye densitometry) and indicate that this method provides a reliable estimate of changes in cardiac output in healthy exercising humans (Matsukawa et al 2004), patients with septic shock (Jellema et al 1999) or during prolonged tilt testing (Harms et al 1999). However, the validity of absolute ModelFlow estimates are uncertain during initial changes in posture or with ageing (Remmen et al 2002).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When calibrated against a "gold standard" method to determine cardiac output (CO) such as thermodilution or the Fick method, this methodology provides accurate estimates of changes in SV in patients with septic shock 20 and cardiovascular disease 19,21 and during orthostatic stress. 22 The middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCA V) was measured in the proximal segment of the right MCA (Multidop X4).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 The Modelflow method assumes a population average of aortic area depending on gender, age, height and weight. Several studies have validated the Modelflow method compared with standard invasive techniques and indicate that this method provides a reliable estimate of changes in cardiac output in a variety of physiological 41 and pathological 42,43 conditions. Moreover, it has been shown that after calibration, the tracking of changes in SV and .…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%