2016 IEEE 6th Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization (LDAV) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ldav.2016.7874333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour forests: Fast multi-threaded augmented contour trees

Abstract: This paper presents a new algorithm for the fast, shared memory multi-threaded computation of contour trees on tetrahedral meshes. In contrast to previous multi-threaded algorithms, our technique computes the augmented contour tree. Such an augmentation is required to enable the full extent of contour tree based applications, including for instance data segmentation. Our approach relies on a range-driven domain partitioning. We show how to exploit such a partitioning to rapidly compute contour forests. We also… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our analysis pipeline involves computing an overview of features with TTK, in particular extracting critical points and computing their persistence, as well as visualizing persistence diagrams and persistence curves. We use this information to guide a segmentation of the data domain based on using the contour forests method for fast extraction of contour trees [30]. We consider multiple scales of features, based on a manual analysis of the persistence diagram to set persistence thresholds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, our analysis pipeline involves computing an overview of features with TTK, in particular extracting critical points and computing their persistence, as well as visualizing persistence diagrams and persistence curves. We use this information to guide a segmentation of the data domain based on using the contour forests method for fast extraction of contour trees [30]. We consider multiple scales of features, based on a manual analysis of the persistence diagram to set persistence thresholds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reeb graphs and contour trees have been well studied by the visualization community, offering a number of approaches for their computation in two-and three-dimensional settings [5,17,22,23,30,54,56,57,67]. In our work, we construct segmentations of the input domain based on the contour tree, and rely on the fact that these segmentations correspond to regions of interest in the data (specifically, we consider vortex identification).…”
Section: Topological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the approaches which addressed the time performance improvement of contour tree computation through shared-memory parallelism, only a few of them rely directly on the original merge tree computation algorithm [10], [11]. This algorithm is then used within partitions of the mesh resulting from a static decomposition on the CPU cores, by either dividing the geometrical domain [55] or the scalar range [52]. This leads in both cases to extra computation (with respect to the sequential mono-partition computation) at the partition boundaries when joining results from different partitions.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads in both cases to extra computation (with respect to the sequential mono-partition computation) at the partition boundaries when joining results from different partitions. This can also lead to load imbalance among the different partitions [52].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we refer to this tree structure as the topographic map and we use the Fast Level Set Transform (FLST) [Monasse and Guichard, 2000] to compute it e ciently. Alternatively, one might choose contour tree computation methods, widely used in the scienti c visualization community [Carr et al, 2003, Gueunet et al, 2016. A schematic representation of the topographic map is displayed in Figure 2.…”
Section: Topographic Map -Technical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%