2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3023128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contract-Based Scheduling of URLLC Packets in Incumbent EMBB Traffic

Abstract: Recently, the coexistence of ultra-reliable and low-latency communication (URLLC) and enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) services on the same licensed spectrum has gained a lot of attention from both academia and industry. However, the coexistence of these services is not trivial due to the diverse multiple access protocols, contrasting frame distributions in the existing network, and the distinct quality of service requirements posed by these services. Therefore, such coexistence drives towards a challenging re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume the stronger user is a uRLLC UE which only can decode and remove CCI from the weak user is eMBB UE. While the eMBB UE with weaker channel conditions cannot wholly eliminate the interference of uRLLC UEs’ signals, which results in maximized throughput for the eMBB UE with contrast [ 40 ] and prove it with the results in Section 5 Because our approach is based on uRLLC UE is superimposed with eMBB UE through a few mini slots and assigned high power for eMBB UE to reduce the latency by providing a high rate to the paired uRLLC UEs at a mini slot and achieving high reliability. Thus, the effect of CCI on eMBB UE is less than if the conventional pairing is along a TTI.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We assume the stronger user is a uRLLC UE which only can decode and remove CCI from the weak user is eMBB UE. While the eMBB UE with weaker channel conditions cannot wholly eliminate the interference of uRLLC UEs’ signals, which results in maximized throughput for the eMBB UE with contrast [ 40 ] and prove it with the results in Section 5 Because our approach is based on uRLLC UE is superimposed with eMBB UE through a few mini slots and assigned high power for eMBB UE to reduce the latency by providing a high rate to the paired uRLLC UEs at a mini slot and achieving high reliability. Thus, the effect of CCI on eMBB UE is less than if the conventional pairing is along a TTI.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, constraint (29) should take into consideration the superimposed time of pairing in our calculations, which is a random integer mini-slot time. Therefore, a one-to-one matching game [ 40 , 55 , 55 ] is used to acquire the UE-slice pairing solution, which is explained in Section 4.2 .…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the hard latency requirements of URLLC users, arriving URLLC traffic must be transmitted immediately and cannot be delayed to a later time slot. Therefore, eMBB transmissions are supposed to schedule in the slot, and URLLC transmissions are supposed to schedule in the mini‐slot to achieve latency requirements 5‐12 . Alsenwi et al 5 maximized the average data rate of eMBB users while URLLC constraints were satisfied, and the variance of eMBB data rates was minimized to protect low‐rate eMBB users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], a null space-based spatial perforation scheduler for joint URLLC / eMBB traffic has been proposed. The authors in [11] formulated a URLLC traffic allocation problem by adopting an overlay or perforation scheme. In practice, when the URLLC service is started in the middle of the eMBB transport block, part of the eMBB symbols are replaced and/or overlapped with the symbols in the URLLC packet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%