2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06372-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of noise reduction pre-processing and microphone directionality strategies in the speech recognition in noise in adult cochlear implant users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we had results with a positive S/N ratio in the speech-to-frontal noise tests in the adult population. In the study by Goff et al ( 15 ), the HINT with adaptive noise had an average of 5.87 dB and a fixed average of 71.19%; thus, these data corroborated our results. In the SB, we found 81.8% on average for children, 77.2% for adults and 88.3% for children and adults using the CLABOX.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we had results with a positive S/N ratio in the speech-to-frontal noise tests in the adult population. In the study by Goff et al ( 15 ), the HINT with adaptive noise had an average of 5.87 dB and a fixed average of 71.19%; thus, these data corroborated our results. In the SB, we found 81.8% on average for children, 77.2% for adults and 88.3% for children and adults using the CLABOX.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A difference between these studies occurred in the criterion of the percentage of correct answers in the sentences; in this study, the assertive results were selected with a more difficult percentage of 75% versus 50% in the other studies ( 9 , 10 ). This shows that we established a more difficult criterion for the S/N ratio and in the difference between normal-hearing children and those with CIs ( 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To verify the contribution of the MM2 in noise and reverberation, speech recognition was assessed presenting speech coming from the front and multi-talker babble noise of seven sources separated by 45 o with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of + 10dB, and speech presented at 65dB SPL. To avoid learning bias or fatigue during the assessment, test order was randomized through the website Research Randomizer (18) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para verificar a contribuição do MM2 no ruído e na reverberação, foi avaliado o reconhecimento de fala apresentando balbucio de sete fontes separadas por 45 o com relação sinal-ruído (SNR) de + 10dB, e fala apresentada a 65dB NPS. Para evitar viés de aprendizagem ou fadiga durante a avaliação, a ordem dos testes foi randomizada pelo website Research Randomizer (18) .…”
Section: Métodosunclassified