Controlling for false discoveries subsequently to large scale one‐way ANOVA testing in proteomics: Practical considerations

Bürger, Thomas

doi:10.1002/pmic.202200406

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Exploratory factor analysis, Bartlett's tests, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index were used to evaluate the construct validity (34). Correlations between variables were examined using Pearson correlation analysis, group comparisons were conducted using t-tests, and comparisons across multiple groups were assessed using ANOVA (35).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of the Persian Translation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Questionnaire

Soltani,

Mafi,

Jamshidy

et al. 2023

J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Questionnaire is a validated instrument extensively used to diagnose TMD. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the Persian translation of the DC/TMD. Methods: A team of specialists assessed the questionnaire's final version for content and form validity after translation. A questionnaire was given to 150 students at the Kermanshah Faculty of Dentistry. The convergent validity was assessed by determining the connection between item scores and computing Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The test-retest reliability was evaluated by comparing the results obtained in two phases using the correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients of 30 students from the Faculty of Dentistry. Results: The ICC coefficient of the Persian DC/TMD questionnaire was 0.98. The questionnaire's overall Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure was 0.62, suggesting that the questions were acceptable. The Bartlett's test was significant (P < 0.0001). The internal consistency of each question was strong, with a Cronbach's alpha rating of 0.90 or above. The content validity index (CVI) indicated an appropriate degree of content validity, which was 0.95. Conclusions: The Persian version of the questionnaire can be utilized in clinical settings to diagnose and assess TMD among Persian speaking populations.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of the Persian Translation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Questionnaire

Soltani,

Mafi,

Jamshidy

et al. 2023

J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When comparing the differences between groups with different screw insertion depths, a one-way ANOVA was used for these continuous variables. A p -value less than 0.05 indicated a significant difference ( Burger, 2023 ; Chatzi and Doody, 2023 ).…”

Section: Toggle Tests Under Different Loading Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Incomplete insertion of pedicle screws triggers a higher biomechanical risk of screw loosening: mechanical tests and corresponding numerical simulations

Yang,

Luo,

Liu

et al. 2024

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Screw loosening is a widely reported issue after spinal screw fixation and triggers several complications. Biomechanical deterioration initially causes screw loosening. Studies have shown that incomplete insertion of pedicle screws increases the risk of screw breakage by deteriorating the local mechanical environment. However, whether this change has a biomechanical effect on the risk of screw loosening has not been determined. This study conducted comprehensive biomechanical research using polyurethane foam mechanical tests and corresponding numerical simulations to verify this topic. Pedicle screw-fixed polyurethane foam models with screws with four different insertion depths were constructed, and the screw anchoring ability of different models was verified by toggle tests with alternating and constant loads. Moreover, the stress distribution of screw and bone-screw interfaces in different models was computed in corresponding numerical mechanical models. Mechanical tests presented better screw anchoring ability with deeper screw insertion, but parameters presented no significant difference between groups with complete thread insertion. Correspondingly, higher stress values can be recorded in the model without complete thread insertion; the difference in stress values between models with complete thread insertion was relatively slight. Therefore, incomplete thread insertion triggers local stress concentration and the corresponding risk of screw loosening; completely inserting threads could effectively alleviate local stress concentration and result in the prevention of screw loosening.

show abstract

Customized Artificial Implants: Bionic Design and Multiscale Evaluation

2024

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frontiers is more than just an open access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers journal seriesThe Frontiers journal series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of openaccess, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers journal series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to qualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. What are Frontiers Research Topics?Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers journals series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject. With their unique mix of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Frontiers Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area.

show abstract

Controlling for false discoveries subsequently to large scale one‐way ANOVA testing in proteomics: Practical considerations

Cited by 3 publications

References 41 publications

Validity and Reliability of the Persian Translation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Questionnaire

Validity and Reliability of the Persian Translation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Questionnaire

Incomplete insertion of pedicle screws triggers a higher biomechanical risk of screw loosening: mechanical tests and corresponding numerical simulations

Customized Artificial Implants: Bionic Design and Multiscale Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About