2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01682-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score as a predictive marker for short-term complications following gastrectomy of gastric cancer: a retrospective study

Abstract: Background It is well established that the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score was correlated with long-term outcomes in gastric cancer (GC), but the significance of CONUT for postoperative short-term outcomes remains unclear. The study aimed to characterize the relationship between CONUT and short-term complications following gastrectomy of GC. Methods We collected data on 1479 consecutive GC patients at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariate logistics regression analysis indicated that a CONUT score greater than 6 could be used as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in older adult patients. Although current studies support that the CONUT score has a predictive effect on the prognosis of patients with a variety of diseases, the current findings have different cut-off values ( 10 , 12 , 14 ). Therefore, the predictive role of different CONUT score cut-off values need to be validated in populations with different diseases, and the best cut-off value should be confirmed in multicenter, large-sample, prospective clinical studies in the future.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multivariate logistics regression analysis indicated that a CONUT score greater than 6 could be used as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in older adult patients. Although current studies support that the CONUT score has a predictive effect on the prognosis of patients with a variety of diseases, the current findings have different cut-off values ( 10 , 12 , 14 ). Therefore, the predictive role of different CONUT score cut-off values need to be validated in populations with different diseases, and the best cut-off value should be confirmed in multicenter, large-sample, prospective clinical studies in the future.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a nutritional scoring tool that is calculated using serum albumin, total cholesterol level, and total lymphocyte count (7). Current studies suggest that CONUT is associated with short-and long-term prognoses in some diseases, particularly cancers (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). However, the predictive role of the CONUT score for in-hospital mortality in older adult inpatients has not been clearly established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CONUT score can also be used as a prognostic predictor for many other solid tumors. Studies have found that the CONUT score is a strong independent predictor of postoperative complications and longterm prognosis in colorectal cancer, 13,[22][23][24] cholangiocarcinoma, 25,26 kidney cancer, 27 esophageal cancer, 28 gastric cancer, 12,29 pancreatic cancer, 30 and liver cancer. 31,32 We established a nomogram based on the CONUT score for accurate prediction of the prognosis of patients with lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CONUT score has gained increasing attention because it is clinically easy to calculate and correlates with subjective overall assessments and overall nutrition assessments 11 . The CONUT score can be used as a useful indicator for evaluating prognosis in some solid tumors, such as gastric cancer, liver cancer, and colorectal cancer 8,12,13 . However, there are few studies on the clinical significance of the CONUT score in predicting the prognosis of patients with lung cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation