2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05035-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Background This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon (CCRB) for induction of labor (IOL) at term in primipara. Methods A total of 227 singleton full-term pregnancies with indications of IOL were enrolled and randomly divided into the control and study groups in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. In the control group, a conventional method was used. Both the uterin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the overall success rate of induction of labor was more than 96%, this was basically consistent with Wen C 's study [30] (97.8%). In a meta-analysis study [31], it was found that the total vaginal delivery rate of single balloon catheter was 78.8%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the overall success rate of induction of labor was more than 96%, this was basically consistent with Wen C 's study [30] (97.8%). In a meta-analysis study [31], it was found that the total vaginal delivery rate of single balloon catheter was 78.8%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, most studies did not mention the effect of different cervical scores on catheter balloon induction of labor. In Wen C 's study [30], it was only found that patients with initial Bishop score ≤ 3 and patients with initial Bishop score of 4-6 had significant improvement in Bishop score after balloon Data were expressed as rate (%); 1 Chi-square promotion of cervical ripening, but the influence of other aspects was not mentioned. In our study, we found that there was no significant difference in the final methods of delivery between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both have been extensively studied and have shown to be safe and effective [10][11][12]. However, recent research has suggested that the double-balloon catheter may be a safer approach for patients [13][14][15]. The LDRP delivery model, which is gaining popularity in China for its emphasis on natural delivery, may not be suitable for pregnant women who are at a higher risk for complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%