2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12243-015-0463-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion from mono-axial to isotropic measurements for assessing human exposure to electromagnetic fields of GSM/DCS/UMTS base stations

Abstract: This paper proposes a way to assess total electric field strength by using mono-axial probe (instead of isotropic, tri-axial probe). When mono-axial probe is used, additional conversion factor should be applied. Consequently, the usage of mono-axial probe causes additional uncertainty in measurement results that should be taken into account. Measurement results for seven different environments show that the additional multiplicative conversion factor value of 1.95 should be applied and additional uncertainty i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In UMTS, the whole carrier is measured, meaning that the measurement of target cells with different carriers contains power levels received from surrounding base stations/sectors as well. The drawback is that the Rx power measured by the UE cannot be directly linked to power density, needed for exposure calculation, since the link depends on the type of antenna and its relative position to the incident wave vector [43]. In other words, the Rx samples do not capture the whole field.…”
Section: Downlink Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In UMTS, the whole carrier is measured, meaning that the measurement of target cells with different carriers contains power levels received from surrounding base stations/sectors as well. The drawback is that the Rx power measured by the UE cannot be directly linked to power density, needed for exposure calculation, since the link depends on the type of antenna and its relative position to the incident wave vector [43]. In other words, the Rx samples do not capture the whole field.…”
Section: Downlink Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%