2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2019.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex dominating sets in maximal outerplanar graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same paper, the authors conjectured that γ(G) ≤ n 4 for every n-vertex triangulation G, when n is large enough. Since then, several papers have been devoted to either trying to prove that conjecture [23,31,34], or showing thigh bounds, mainly for MOPs, for several variants of the domination number [2,3,4,6,7,9,10,19,26,31,35,37]. In particular, Canales et al [3] proved that γ pr (G) ≤ 2 n 4 for any MOP G of order n ≥ 4, and Henning and Kaemawichanurat [19] showed that γ pr2 (G) ≤ 2 5 n for any MOP G of order n ≥ 5, except for a special family F of MOPs of order 9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same paper, the authors conjectured that γ(G) ≤ n 4 for every n-vertex triangulation G, when n is large enough. Since then, several papers have been devoted to either trying to prove that conjecture [23,31,34], or showing thigh bounds, mainly for MOPs, for several variants of the domination number [2,3,4,6,7,9,10,19,26,31,35,37]. In particular, Canales et al [3] proved that γ pr (G) ≤ 2 n 4 for any MOP G of order n ≥ 4, and Henning and Kaemawichanurat [19] showed that γ pr2 (G) ≤ 2 5 n for any MOP G of order n ≥ 5, except for a special family F of MOPs of order 9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], Lemanska et al presented an alternative proof of this last result. The reader is referred to [3,2,4,12,16] for other results in MOPs related to some variants of the domination concept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%