[Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1992
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1992.225947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooccurrence smoothing for stochastic language modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Considerable latitude is allowed in defining the set S(w 1 ), as is evidenced by previous work that can be put in the above form. Essen & Steinbiss (1992) and Karov & Edelman (1996) (implicitly) set S(w 1 ) = V 1 . However, it may be desirable to restrict S(w 1 ) in some fashion for efficiency reasons, especially if V 1 is large.…”
Section: Combining Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Considerable latitude is allowed in defining the set S(w 1 ), as is evidenced by previous work that can be put in the above form. Essen & Steinbiss (1992) and Karov & Edelman (1996) (implicitly) set S(w 1 ) = V 1 . However, it may be desirable to restrict S(w 1 ) in some fashion for efficiency reasons, especially if V 1 is large.…”
Section: Combining Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the disambiguation evaluation, we compared several variants of our initial method and the cooccurrence smoothing method of Essen & Steinbiss (1992) against the estimation method of Katz in a decision task involving unseen pairs of direct objects and verbs. We found that all the similarity-based models performed almost 40% better than back-off, which yielded about 49% accuracy in our experimental setting.…”
Section: Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations