Coping With Crisis: Green Space Use in Helsinki Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged a deeper exploration about how people deal with crisis. This paper presents one of the first pre- and during-pandemic assessments of urban green infrastructure (UGI) use across the same individuals with the aim of better understanding how people's use of different types of urban green and blue spaces changed during the pandemic. A baseline Public Participation GIS survey (N = 1,583 respondents) conducted in August 2018 was followed up in May 2020 (N = 418 identical respondents) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Helsinki, Finland. We found that residents were more likely to visit UGI closer to their home during the pandemic compared with before the pandemic. Patterns of use of UGI were associated with the quality of residential green areas, for example, people sought out forests nearby one's domicile and tended to avoid parks and recreation areas in order to escape the pressures of lockdown, socially distance and avoid overcrowding. However, spatial cluster analyses also revealed that the places mapped by intensive users of natural recreational areas and more outdoor oriented users became more dispersed during the pandemic, suggesting their active search for new types of UGI, including use of agricultural land and residential areas with high tree density cover. Our results further highlighted that some types of UGI such as more distant natural and semi-natural areas and blue spaces serve as critical infrastructure both before and during the pandemic. Natural and semi-natural areas experienced very little change in use. The presented results have implications for how planners design and manage green spaces to enable residents to cope with crises like pandemics into the future.

Does Spending Time in Nature Help Students Cope with the COVID-19 Pandemic?

“…Unlike several other nature pandemic studies [23,24,26,53], on average, our participants did not report spending significantly more time in nature. They did report spending more time in green spaces, specifically, and they also indicated that they appreciated nature more, feared it less, and noticed wildlife slightly more as a result of the pandemic.…”

Has the Pandemic Altered Public Perception of How Local Green Spaces Affect Quality of Life in the United Kingdom?

“…During the peak of the pandemic, prolonged home confinement because of travel restrictions was a source of motivation that influenced city dwellers' behaviour and preference for parks and open spaces [19]. Several studies also reported a general increase in green space use during the pandemic [20][21][22][23]. According to an Australian study, females were more likely than men to adjust their green space visiting frequency during the pandemic, and they also placed a greater value on green spaces for social and familial relationships, as well as spiritual reasons [24].…”

Human Flow Dataset Reveals Changes in Citizens’ Outing Behaviors including Greenspace Visits before and during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Kanazawa, Japan

“…Ugolini et al [ 9 ] also pointed to the importance of diverse urban greenspace and related means of transportation: people walking to small urban gardens nearby (e.g., in Italy) or tree-lined streets (e.g., in Spain, Israel), and people traveling by car to green areas outside the city (e.g., in Lithuania). Similarly, Korpilo et al [ 41 ] showed that Helsinki residents were more likely to visit greenspaces closer to their homes for recreation during the pandemic than before the pandemic. Residents were more likely to visit nearby residential areas with high tree cover density, underscoring the importance of urban forests and tree-rich parks in their neighborhoods.…”