It is often remarked that the molar mass distribution (MMD) of a polymer contains the entire history of its synthesis. It is because of this truism that those interested in the kinetics of polymerization are driven to understand polymer MMDs. As will be seen in this chapter, in the case of (conventional) radical polymerization (RP), this quest has been enormously advanced by the advent of large-molecule mass spectrometry (MS), for it is a characterization technique that furnishes hitherto unimaginable detail about the MMD of a polymer, and thus it may be used to elucidate or confirm the mechanisms of RP in many ways that simply were not previously possible.What is it that is so special about an MMD yielded by MS? It is not the distribution amount, for size exclusion chromatography (SEC) already makes a superior fist of measuring that, mostly through the use of refractive-index (RI) detection. Admittedly there can be issues with this, for example, that RI is molar mass dependent for oligomers [1]. However, such issues apply only in particular circumstances, and they pale beside the general uncertainty one must attach to polymer amounts as returned via MS: there is no doubt that SEC is a vastly superior technique in this respect. Rather, what is so special about MS is its delivery of the MMD variable, namely molar mass, M. The two important aspects here are mass accuracy and mass resolving powerFor many large-molecule studies, it is the mass accuracy of MS that is revolutionary. Indeed, the knee-jerk reaction of most RP workers would be that this is also the case in their field. In fact, the matter is not so straightforward. A good illustrative example of this is the pulsed-laser polymerization (PLP) method for measuring propagation rate coefficients, k p [3, 4], which requires knowledge of absolute values of M. By now an enormous quantity of accurate k p data has been yielded by this method, almost all of it through the use of SEC [5,6]. This evidences that for the study of RP kinetics and mechanisms, accurate SEC calibration is commonly possible, either directly through the use of standards, or indirectly through the additional use of Mark-Houwink parameters (so-called universal calibration). So, it is not this aspect alone that makes MS so useful.In fact what is so groundbreaking about MS for the study of RP mechanisms is its mass resolving power, that is, the ability of mass analyzers to separate and measure small differences in M, by now to well under 1-Dalton level with most instruments. As Barner-Kowollik et al. expressed it, this gives the power to visualize the individual polymer chains present in a given sample [7]. Thus, for example, polymer chains of identical degree of polymerization but with a different end group can be resolved, something of which SEC will never (in general) be capable. Because of the accurate determination of the M of the resolved species, their precise chemical composition may be deduced, and from this the mechanism of polymer formation can be inferred. Numerous examples of this ge...